Monday, April 24, 2023

THE HILLARY MACHINE - The domestic purveyors of disinformation are the real threat to national security By David Zukerman We should not be surprised that former CIA deputy director and acting director Mike Morell was involved in a Deep State ploy to prevent the reelection of President Trump, as noted in this report from Kristina Wong at Breitbart: "Ohio Republican Reps. Jim Jordan, chair of the Weaponization Committee, and Mike Turner, chair of the Intelligence Committee, on Thursday revealed that former CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell testified to Congress that in October 2020, Blinken — who was then a senior adviser on the Biden campaign — reached out to him regarding the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story, prompting Morell to write a letter signed by 50 other former intelligence officials suggesting the story was Russian disinformation. “'Based on Morell’s testimony, it is apparent that the Biden campaign played an active role in the origins of the public statement, which had the effect of helping to suppress the Hunter Biden story,' Jordan and Turner wrote in a letter that revealed Blinken’s involvement." Morell, published an op-ed in The New York Times on August 5, 2016 promoting Hillary Clinton for president -- and badmouthing Donald J. Trump as a threat to national security. The following week, the Times gave Morell more space to promote Clinton and badmouth Trump. His first hawking of Hillary pointed to his service at the CIA, as if to claim special expertise in pushing a presidential candidate. Four years later, Morell simply got 50 other intel flacks to lie on behalf of the Biden candidacy. Repeat -- to lie to the American people about the issue of foreign -- Russian -- disinformation. Yet, the source of disinformation is, quite apparently, more within, than of foreign origin. That is to say, the usual Deep State suspects, along with their media acolytes, are not to be trusted. But aided by the fake news media, they pulled the wool over the eyes of the American people with their lies about Russia, Russia, Russia, in 2016, 2017 and thereafter, and, as we have just learned, Morell -- who probably needed little encouragement from Mr. Blinken -- succeeded in discrediting a true New York Post story about Hunter Biden and the contents of his missing laptop. The truth was reported by the New York Post. The fake news was the claim that the Post story was Russian disinformation. And the liars won -- installing their puppet in the White House. Photo credit: US Embassy Nigeria (public domain) In brief, how long are the American people going to be deceived by the lies of the intel committee that serves the Deep State aim of promoting the good life for the insiders, supported by the majority of Americans eking by on the fringes of society? Rep. Harriet Hageman calls for Secretary of State Blinken to be hauled before the "weaponization by government" panel of the House Judiciary Committee. (And thank goodness, Rep. Hageman replaced the execrable Liz Cheney as House member from Wyoming.) If Blinken does appear, Republican members of the panel would do well to bear in mind the tendency of the hard left to project their own mindset on others. In this case, where Morell, in August 2016 called candidate Trump a national security threat, the truth is that those who would maintain power by disinformation are the real threat to national security. To employ a metaphor -- how long are Republicans in House and Senate going to let the hard left get away with crying "wolf"?

 

On the other hand, Schweizer and Eggers note that Hillary Clinton actually violated federal election rules in 2016, in a case directly related to the work of G-A-I. Schweizer’s 2015 book, Clinton Cashexposed Hillary Clinton’s involvement with the takeover of an American uranium mining company by Russia. That revelation so terrified Clinton’s presidential campaign they decided to pay for the infamous Steele Dossier, with its lurid, unsubstantiated claims that Donald Trump was a Russian stooge. Hillary’s campaign essentially accused the Trump campaign of doing what they were, in fact, guilty of themselves.Peter Schweizer

 

Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions.  Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.

By Deborah C. Tyler

The domestic purveyors of disinformation are the real threat to national security

We should not be surprised that former CIA deputy director and acting director Mike Morell was involved in a Deep State ploy to prevent the reelection of President Trump, as noted in this report from Kristina Wong at Breitbart:

"Ohio Republican Reps. Jim Jordan, chair of the Weaponization Committee, and Mike Turner, chair of the Intelligence Committee, on Thursday revealed that former CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell testified to Congress that in October 2020, Blinken — who was then a senior adviser on the Biden campaign — reached out to him regarding the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story, prompting Morell to write a letter signed by 50 other former intelligence officials suggesting the story was Russian disinformation.

“'Based on Morell’s testimony, it is apparent that the Biden campaign played an active role in the origins of the public statement, which had the effect of helping to suppress the Hunter Biden story,' Jordan and Turner wrote in a letter that revealed Blinken’s involvement."

Morell, published an op-ed in The New York Times on August 5, 2016 promoting Hillary Clinton for president -- and badmouthing Donald J. Trump as a threat to national security.  The following week, the Times gave Morell more space to promote Clinton and badmouth Trump.  His first hawking of Hillary pointed to his service at the CIA, as if to claim special expertise in pushing a presidential candidate.  Four years later, Morell simply got 50 other intel flacks to lie on behalf of the Biden candidacy.   Repeat -- to lie to the American people about the issue of foreign -- Russian -- disinformation.

Yet, the source of disinformation is, quite apparently, more within, than of foreign origin.   That is to say, the usual Deep State suspects, along with their media acolytes, are not to be trusted.   But aided by the fake news media, they pulled the wool over the eyes of the American people with their lies about Russia, Russia, Russia, in 2016, 2017 and thereafter, and, as we have just learned, Morell -- who probably needed little encouragement from Mr. Blinken -- succeeded in discrediting a true New York Post story about Hunter Biden and the contents of his missing laptop.  The truth was reported by the New York Post.  The fake news was the claim that the Post story was Russian disinformation.  And the liars won -- installing their puppet in the White House.

Photo credit: US Embassy Nigeria (public domain)

In brief, how long are the American people going to be deceived by the lies of the intel committee that serves the Deep State aim of promoting the good life for the insiders, supported by the majority of Americans eking by on the fringes of society?

Rep. Harriet Hageman calls for Secretary of State Blinken to be hauled before the "weaponization by government" panel of the House Judiciary Committee.     (And thank goodness, Rep. Hageman replaced the execrable Liz Cheney as House member from Wyoming.)  If Blinken does appear, Republican members of the panel would do well to bear in mind the tendency of the hard left to project their own mindset on others.    In this case, where Morell, in August 2016 called candidate Trump a national security threat, the truth is that those who would maintain power by disinformation are the real threat to national security.   To employ a metaphor -- how long are Republicans in House and Senate going to let the hard left get away with crying "wolf"?

 

Is Hillary Running?

She just dropped a big hint about 2024.

Will the third time be the charm for America’s angry abuela, Hillary Clinton? In the course of an interview about her bête noire, Donald Trump, and the testy dementia patient currently occupying the fake Oval Office, the always-a-bridesmaid-never-a-bride candidate threw in an odd non-sequitur about how she thinks that she herself is capable of performing the duties of the presidency. As Old Joe continues to falter, will we see Hillary 2024?

In an interview published Wednesday, Clinton spent most of her time criticizing Donald Trump, because obviously we haven’t had enough of her doing that. Trump can’t win in 2024, and in a classic case of projection, the woman who tried to frame him for colluding with Russia in order to win the presidency illegitimately added, “I always thought about him, if you follow him you can see it — he accuses people of things he himself is doing, it’s a form of psychological projection.”

Yeah, you could say that. Hillary Clinton knows all about projection. She demonstrated that anew as she continued, “I always thought his record in business in particular, but then as we saw him in politics and government, he was someone who cared nothing about rules. He cared nothing about the law.”

If that were true, it wouldn’t have been necessary to fabricate the Russian Collusion hoax, or make an impeachable offense out of a phone call, or fabricate the Jan. 6 “insurrection” hoax, or magnify misdemeanors into felonies to create a criminal offense for which Trump was indicted. If Trump really had contempt for the law, as Hillary claimed, he would already be in prison for things he had actually done, since there are so many powerful people who would love to see him behind bars. There would be no need for all the hoaxes and mountains made out of molehills.

America’s sweetheart went on to dismiss Trump’s chances for 2024: “But even if he gets the Republican nomination, he cannot, in my view, be re-elected president. I think more people are on to him and his behavior than they were before. He has a hard core of support that is likely to help him win the Republican nomination. But in a general election against President Biden, I do not believe he can win.” She didn’t say whether or not that would be true even without ballot harvesting and mail-in ballots and all the other modern-day ways to win elections.

While knocking Trump, Hillary also threw an elbow at Ron De Santis, saying he wouldn’t make it because he is “unproven. Nobody really outside of Florida knows very much about him, and in Florida, they’re watching him do crazy things.” That’s why people are flocking to move to Florida from all over the country. When Hillary says “crazy things,” she means “crazy” like protecting little kids from drag queens. Many, if not most, Americans want more of that kind of crazy.

But in Hillary’s dystopian vision, the Democrats are really our only choice. She said that she thinks Old Joe will coast to another four years of pretending to be president: “So I actually believe that President Biden will be re-elected regardless of who the Republican nominee is.” And this is where things get weird. Sky News says that at that point, “she dismissed suggestions Mr Biden, who is 80 years old, would be too old to be president.” Then: “‘I feel like I could do the job. I’m in my mid-70s,’ she added. ‘I think it really should be a matter of what he has done as president.’” Wait a minute. How’s that again?

This looks as if Clinton offered her own alleged ability to do the job as president in support of the claim that Joe Biden is able to do it. But she is both younger than Old Joe (by nearly five years) and hasn’t shown nearly as many public indications of dementia as he has. So what does her supposed ability to be president have to do with Biden’s?

Nothing, of course. What appears to be going on here is that Hillary is signaling that she can be a viable replacement for Biden if he finally gives up the pretense and retires to his taxpayer-funded, walled Delaware beach house. Will we see “I’m With Her One More Time” in 2024? Stranger things have happened. Move over, Kamala Harris! The original Cackler may be on her way to a startling comeback.

Avatar photo

Robert Spencer

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 26 books including many bestsellers, such as The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)The Truth About Muhammad and The History of Jihad. His latest books are The Critical Qur’an and The Sumter Gambit. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

Reader Interactions

SAUDI DIRTY MONEY ENDS UP IN THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FAMILY SLUSH FUND

Jesse Watters: The Clintons' crooked connections

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnPSvkxKuLg

 

HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?

“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton (LAWYERS-2) Foundation and the (LAWYERS-2) Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden (LAWYERS-3) family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (LAWYER) Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (YOU CAN ADD LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS AND LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER TO THE PATHEION OF DEMOCRAT BRIBES SUCKING CORRUPT LAWYER POLITICIANS!).          BRIAN C JOONDEPH

 

One topic that Hillary is quick to criticize President Trump on is his relationship with Saudia Arabia. It’s ironic given the Clinton Foundation’s refusal to state that they will no longer accept financial donations from The Kingdom as others have.

 

But the Clinton Foundation, to which donations declined dramatically after Clinton’s 2016 defeat, has taken multi-million dollar contributions from Saudi Arabia in the past and isn’t ruling out continuing to accept them.

 

The Clinton Foundation accepted between $10 and $25 million from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, with donations coming as late as 2014. A now-defunct group named “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” which was reportedly co-founded by a Saudi Prince and often worked as a PR front for the kingdom, also donated between $1 and $5 million.

Qatar's longstanding efforts to buy influence in the United States have, quite unsurprisingly, included substantial donations to the Clinton Foundation. In 2011, for example, the foundation accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar in honor of former president Bill Clinton's 65th birthday. Hillary was serving as secretary of state at the time, but failed to disclose the massive donation to the State Department despite her pledge to keep the agency apprised of the foundation's foreign donors.

 

 

 


Clinton pulled the 'dirtiest, dirtiest' tricks in American politics: Goodwin

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MnyIh51EcY

 

All criminal roads lead back to Hillary Clinton: Former US attorney

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rTyFs8gbpU

 

No comments:

Post a Comment