"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
Hillary Clinton's Crisis of Character
Crisis of Character is the perfect name for a book about Hillary Clinton. Written by former presidential Secret Service agent Gary Byrne, it recounts how he was up close and personal with the then First Lady. Anyone reading this book can relate his issues with the Clintons as to how she conducted herself while Secretary of State.
While Bill Clinton had personal scandals of sexual harassment, Hillary Clinton has professional scandals. The baseball phrase three strikes and you’re out applies to her. Strike one, the botching of the reset button with Russia; strike two, the handling of Benghazi; and strike three, her email scandal.
While Bill Clinton had personal scandals of sexual harassment, Hillary Clinton has professional scandals. The baseball phrase three strikes and you’re out applies to her. Strike one, the botching of the reset button with Russia; strike two, the handling of Benghazi; and strike three, her email scandal.
In the book, Byrne describes her as “distant, cold, dishonest, and a
habitual liar.” When asked about this, he told American Thinker,
“Americans need to know that Mrs. Clinton is not a leader. She
displays a holier-than-thou attitude, ‘do as I say, not as I do.’ When
I heard her say Bill Clinton would work with her on the economy,
my first thoughts, ‘what steps will she take to protect young
women working at the White House from him?’ Her pattern is
reflection, deception, and lies.”
habitual liar.” When asked about this, he told American Thinker,
“Americans need to know that Mrs. Clinton is not a leader. She
displays a holier-than-thou attitude, ‘do as I say, not as I do.’ When
I heard her say Bill Clinton would work with her on the economy,
my first thoughts, ‘what steps will she take to protect young
women working at the White House from him?’ Her pattern is
reflection, deception, and lies.”
A word Mr. Byrne forgot to mention regarding Hillary was 'incompetent'. Take, for example, the reset button given to Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in 2009. Lavrov noted the translation said, “overcharge,” not reset. Also, the word was typed in Latin script, not in Cyrillic. So wrong word. Wrong alphabet. It later came out that Hillary and company had sidestepped traditional protocol by not asking State’s team of translators to help.
Now she wants the American people to hit the reset button on her scandals. Bryne has many adjectives to describe the Clintons, including “Crass, arrogant, and ruthless.” While going into great detail about the Battle of Mogadishu in 1993, he points out how the Army Rangers were stripped of requested equipment so they did not look intimidating. Sound familiar? Seems Hillary Clinton used it as her playbook for Benghazi. He explained that her testimony fit into the behavior he was familiar with, especially when she uttered the line, “what difference does it make,” while speaking of those who died. There is also the example of how she lied to the families, blaming it on a video instead of terrorism. It did not matter that there was a rescue force waiting for eight hours to get the action order, one that never came. Byrne is hoping the American people understand that “she has a deep-seated dislike of the uniformed military and uniformed law enforcement. The very sight of us bothers her. She always gets a pass. It is like we are in this alternative universe. Bill Clinton had Black Hawk Down and she has Benghazi. Mrs. Clinton does not know how to manage and supervise, but does know how to yell and dictate. John Wooden said, ‘A test of someone’s character is what they do when no one is watching.’”
Interestingly, everything he mentioned about her in the book can be applied to the email scandal. He talked about the Clintons having the attitude that they were above the law. Just refer to the meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the runway in Arizona. Then a few days later FBI Director James Comey said about the findings, “this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”
Byrne spoke of how Hillary liked to deflect blame, pleading ignorance. Comey pointed out in his news conference how “None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at departments and agencies of the U.S. Government -- or even with a commercial service like Gmail.”
Throughout the interview Byrne mentioned how Hillary lies and deceives. Remember in her March 15th news conference she claimed, “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material." Yet Comey reported that the FBI identified 113 emails that passed through her server, containing materials that were classified at the time sent, including some that were Top Secret.
Finally, Byrne noted she is “arrogant, has disdain, and a desire to push her agenda regardless of the damages. She does not care about any criticism.” This is obvious in Comey’s conclusion, “There is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information… There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”
As a side note, Byrne told American Thinker, “Her attitude was so bad it got to a point that Secret Service agents assigned to her detail would think of it as a punishment. Part of our job hazard was having to deal with her anger management issues.”
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/07/hillary_clintons_emcrisis_of_characterem.html#ixzz4EVKwPS3n
All the Clintons are overpaid divas: We all know the story of the rock band that demanded M&Ms candy backstage with all the brown pieces removed. That story was true, and the band was Van Halen.
But musicians aren't the only ones to make ridiculous demands when they appear for an event. The entire Clinton family has their own lists of demands and special treatment they require in addition to their outsized speaking fees.
Bill Clinton changed the game when it comes to former presidents and their speaking fees. Before him, former commander-in-chiefs would receive about $60,000 for a speech (most of them didn't need the money anyway). But Bill wanted more, so when he signed on with the Harry Walker Agency after he left the White House, he and his handlers demanded $100,000 per speech.
They got it. The money was for six speeches in 2002 at the Foothill-Deanza Community College District, the University of California-Davis and a for-profit organization. In order to pay for Bill's high fees, the community college and university sold tickets and cut back spending on other speakers and entertainers.
Clinton Charity Spends Nearly 80 Percent on Administrative Costs
The Canadian affiliate of the Clinton Foundation is spending an astounding 78 percent of the money it raises on administrative costs, according to the Globe and Mail.
The Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (CGEP) spent nearly 8 dollars for every 10 that it raised on salaries, office supplies, expenses, salaries and consulting fees, according to filings with the Canada Revenue Agency. The charity only spent 22 percent on “charitable programs.”
The CGEP was set up by Canadian mining investor Frank Giustra, who is one of the largest contributors to the Clinton Foundation and a frequent traveling partner with Bill Clinton. Most of the funding has come from mining executives and companies. The CGEP was primarily set up so that Canadians contributing to the Clinton Foundation would receive a tax deduction in Canada.
CGEP officials defended the amount of money spent on administrative costs.
“These expenditures—far from being overhead—are critical to the operational success of CGEP’s work, and help maximize the impact of CGEP’s programs; ensure that more people are reached; and that these programs are run in an effective way,” they noted in a statement released to the Global and Mail.
CGEP also noted that the staff in Canada (including four full time positions) works on “partnership development and marketing, investor prospecting, and finance.”
This is not the first time CGEP has been in the headlines. The Canadian charity has also served as a conduit for undisclosed donations flowing to the Clinton Foundation. Frank Giustra admitted in 2015, after the publication of Clinton Cash, that there were more than 1,000 undisclosed donations to the Clinton Foundation. Many of those had come via CGEP.
Hillary Clinton promised the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee during her confirmation hearings to be Secretary of State that the Foundation would disclose all of its donors. Clinton Foundation also executives signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama White House promising the same in late 2008.
Giustra has figured in several stories involving the Clinton Foundation and foreign financial deals. Giustra was involved in a small Canadian uranium company that received a lucrative uranium concession in Kazakhstan after Bill Clinton visited the country with him in 2005. The company was later sold to the Russian government in a deal which needed approval from Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
Giustra also has considerable financial holdings in Colombia, where the Clinton Foundation is active.
In June 2010, several of his companies
received deals or concessions from the
Colombian government following back-to-
back meetings that Bill Clinton and then-
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had with
the President of Colombia.
Giustra has given tens of millions of dollars to
the Clinton Foundation since 2005.
THE CLINTONS AND
RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING
TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON
Leaked Julian Assange
Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected,
Sadistic Sociopath’
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List
Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
No comments:
Post a Comment