Friday, July 15, 2016

Will Mexico Now Elect All Future American Presidents or Simply Vote to Annex America?



MEXICO SUCKS OFF TENS OF BILLIONS 

OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY EVERY 

YEAR AND ARE A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!


Former Mexican President Vicente Fox: Voting for Trump is ‘Treason to Our Nation’


In “Vincente Fox & All Things Mexico,” Chelsea Handler celebrated the country of Mexico on her Netflix showChelsea. She stated that many Americans think Mexico is a great neighbor – “white, brown, black, but definitely not orange.” Ah, yes. Another show full of Trump bashing.
After going to Mexico City to interview actor Diego Luna while visiting a food market and drinking mescal, she next interviewed lefty actress Eva Longoria. Texas native Longoria wasted no time in going into “the border crossed us” monologue in Texas history. Now a Hillary supporter – she was an Obama supporter in 2008 and 2012 – she gladly took the opportunity afforded by Chelsea to bash Donald Trump for “fear mongering, blaming immigrants for problems.” Note that leftists never say the words “illegal immigrants.” She praised Chelsea’s anti-Trump efforts and said, “Don’t let up” on the bashing.
The grand finale was an interview with former Mexican President Vicente Fox. While saying both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush are still friends (he worked with both as Mexico’s president), he told a story about Bush’s first visit to his ranch. He said Bush was “afraid” of the horses and hadn’t ridden horses before that visit, though Fox thought of him as a fellow rancher. Chelsea asked, “Then why does he wear cowboy boots all the time?” Fox said, “Well, I gave him a pair.” As if that pair was Bush’s first pair of boots. That was really my only laugh in this episode.
Fox, though, is very worried about Donald Trump’s run for the White House. He tells the audience not to listen to “the false prophet” with the “crazy hair” and tells Mexicans in the United States, “It’s treason to our nation, to our origin to vote for him.” Excuse me, but this is an American election and loyalty is owed to this nation, not Mexico.
Fox is all about negotiating with drug cartels and calls himself an activist for legalizing all drugs, but he thinks the current presumptive Republican nominee is using “demagoguery and populism” as he promises to build a wall at the border. And if a trade war breaks out over better deals for America with a President Trump? Well, maybe Mexico “has to find new friends – maybe Russia, maybe we’re going to go back to the Cold War era.” Threats, El Presidente?
Some sage advice from Chelsea herself: if you don’t want to hear the constant, continuing Trump bashing on her show (she says she receives a lot of complaints on social media), “Watch something else.” Good idea.

Study shows immigrants use 40% more welfare than native born

A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies shows that immigrants tap into our welfare system far more than native born Americans.

Daily Caller:
The average immigrant household draws more than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year, costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than people born in the country, a new study finds.

Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.

Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.

The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.

“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.

More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.
If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.

Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies shows that immigrants tap into our welfare system far more than native born Americans.

Daily Caller:

The average immigrant household draws more than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year, costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than people born in the country, a new study finds.

Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.

Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.

The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.

“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.

More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.
If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.

Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.






MEXICAN PRESIDENT ENDORSES LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILLARIA CLINTON.

The staggering cost of Mexico’s looting of

America

://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/09/why-mexico-endorses-hillary-clinton-her.html



The Telmex Foundation, founded by Mexican

billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between

$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary

Clinton.

Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more
aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive
immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning …"

Expect even more executive power grabs from Hillary | WashingtonExaminer.com


APPARENTLY MEXICO'S LOOTING IN OUR OPEN 

BORDERS IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR LA RAZA HILLARY!

Obama expanded his power domestically far more than any other president in memory. His executive action on immigration is a good example of legislating from the bureaucracy by implementing policies directly contrary to existing law and anything Congress would be willing to do.
The server scandal is a metaphor for the old Hillary — opaque, controlling, paranoid, ruthless and power-hungry. It's proof that she hasn't changed.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning …"

ROBERT RECTOR: Importing poverty…. WE

ALSO IMPORT ALL THEIR CRIMINALS

://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2006/10/importing-poverty-immigration-and-poverty-in-the-united-states-a-book-of-charts


FORMER PRESIDENT OF NARCOMEX ENDORSES LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILLARIA!

WILL MEXICO NOW ELECT ALL FUTURE AMERICAN PRESIDENTS? MEX DRUG CARTEL MONEY SAYS Si!

SHE PROMISES OPEN BORDERS, CHAIN MIGRATION, NO E-VERIFY, EXPANDED LA RAZA CARE on the gringo's backs!


No comments:

Post a Comment