Sunday, October 21, 2018

WHY PLUNDERING BANKSTERS, MUSLIM DICTATORS and ILLEGALS LOVE HILLARY CLINTON

Conservatives Love Hillary Clinton

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/conservatives_love_hillary_clinton_comments.html#disqus_thread

By Taylor Lewis
Since life isn't fair and God finds humor in our feeble attempts at self-governance, Hillary Clinton continues to haunt public life, like a jilted ex-girlfriend stalking all your usual hangouts.
The only reason, as I see it, why Clinton is still sought after for insight is purely sadistic: a not insubstantial number of us enjoy watching a loser's reaction to events he can't control.  Hillary shamelessly indulges these rubberneckers, going as far as to write a grievance missive that shot up to the top of the New York Times best-seller list.
With a knack for ill timing, Hillary and her slick-styled lecherous husband are embarking on a six-month speaking tour, which will hit all her major support areas in deep blue metropolises, while leaving out the many purple-state cities that cost her the presidency.  Wisconsin is conspicuously absent from the list.
(Perhaps Hillary is secretly lactose-intolerant and will bust out in hives if she visits America's Dairyland.  Nothing else I see explains her assiduous avoidance of the state.)
Just before the tour gets underway, Hillary granted an interview with CBS correspondent Tony Dokoupil.  Fresh off the Kavanaugh hearings, where the world's greatest deliberative body deliberated on whether or not a distinguished appeals court judge was a dope-peddling gang rapist in his beery youth, the former secretary of state dared to tread into the dangerous territory of sexual misconduct, defending her husband's licentious history.  Unlike in Bosnia, she really encountered enemy fire on the #MeToo battlefield.
Dokoupil wasted little time in addressing the matter, asking a phlegmatic Clinton, "In retrospect, do you think Bill should've resigned in the wake of the Monica Lewinsky scandal?"
"Absolutely not," Hillary replied without missing a beat.  Dokoupil pressed further: "There are people who look at the incidents of the '90s and they say, 'A president of the United States cannot have a consensual relationship with an intern.  The power imbalance is too great.'"
That's when Hillary ditched the intersectionality feminism she appropriated for her 2016 campaign and went right to hard politics, coldly pointing out, "[She] was an adult."  The implication was that since Lewinsky was a few years on the other side of what we consider "legal age," she was responsible for her actions.  In other words, she consented.
In that moment, we caught a glimpse of the Hillary of old, the first lady the media loved to torment.  At the very mention of her husband's affair, her street-fighting instincts kicked in.  Notice the length of time it took for Hillary to parry the rhetorical jab by invoking Lewinsky's legal status: half a breath, maybe less.  Her retort was locked and loaded, and she didn't hesitate to pull the trigger.  Maybe she could have beaten Donald Trump had her more naturallyruthless side been allowed to show during the campaign other than at that fatefulnight at the swank LGBT gala in Manhattan.
Say what you will about the cult of intersectionality, but at least its disciples have a nuanced view of power dynamics.  Hillary, on the other hand, holds the dominant view of sexual ethics, which revolves around choice and assent.
Consent is the watchword of our modern sexual ethos.  All sexual acts are now judged by their consensual nature.  Liberals, progressives, libertarians, and even some conservatives see sex strictly through the lens of explicit approval.  The only outliers are the intersectionality left and religiously traditional conservatives.
When Hillary cites Monica Lewinsky's age, she's echoing a shared sentiment when it comes to sex: if they're both consenting adults, who cares?  Respect the sacral privacy of the bedroom!
Viewing intimate intercourse as just another transaction not at all different from buying groceries robs sex of its larger, inherent meaning.  The teleological nature of sex – its sublime purpose, its emotional dimension, its divine designation – is lost in its commoditization, which is the effect of relying solely on consent as a moral barometer.
"Sexuality is not simply a matter of something that I have, as though my body is another possession just like my wallet or my car," writes theology professor Angela Franks.  The irony of the focus on consent is that it arguably helped give cover to Harvey Weinstein, the Hollywood mogul cum feminist boogeyman.  Weinstein has argued that all of his trysts were consensual and that plenty of his paramours were trading their sexual currency for a shot at fame.  Picture the situation: a young actress is being ogled and fondled by the debauched Weinstein.  She gives in to his advances, if only to better her career.  Isn't that consensual?
By Hillary's and many others' standard, Weinstein taking advantage of aspiring starlets is perfectly permissible.  After all, they consented!  (Weinstein has yet to be found guilty of rape.)
The advocates of a consent-only approach to sex probably don't want their beliefs used to support predators like Weinstein, or even Bill Clinton.  But they're left with little choice: such a parochial view of sex limits the scope of passing judgment on anything other than explicit affirmation.
Is it too conspiratorial to think those in power, like the Clintons, prefer it that way?
Image: Nathania Johnson via Wikimedia Commons.

THE GRIFTERS: HILLARY, BILLARY and CHELSEA… global looters!



"But there is no doubt in my mind that the Clintons, thoroughly practiced

grifters that they are, as well as their increasingly shady daughter, will not

hesitate to use such classified information as they may be able to access for 

personal and political enrichment.  They've been doing it for decades, and

they're not about to stop now." RUSS VAUGHN


CLINTON MAFIA AND THEIR BANKSTERS AT GOLDMAN SACHS
WHO IS TIGHTER WITH THE PLUNDERING BANKSTERS? CLINTON, OBAMA or TRUMP?

The Clinton White House famously abolished the Glass–Steagall legislation, which separated commercial and investment banking. The move was a boon for Wall Street firms and led to major bank mergers that some analysts say helped contribute to the 2008 financial crisis.

Bill and Hillary Clinton raked in massive speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, with CNN documenting a total of at least $7.7 million in paid speeches to big financial firms, including Goldman Sachs and UBS. Hillary Clinton made $675,000 from speeches to Goldman Sachs specifically, and her husband secured more than $1,550,000 from Goldman speeches. In 2005 alone, Bill Clinton collected over $500,000 from three Goldman Sachs events.


Hillary Clinton is simply the epitome of the rabid self – a whirlpool of selfishness, greed, and malignance.


It may well be true that Donald Trump has made his greatest contribution to the nation before even taking office:  the political destruction of Hillary Clinton and her infinitely corrupt machine. J.R. Dunn

"Hillary will do anything to distract you from her reckless record and the damage to the Democratic Party and the America she and The Obama's have created."


WIFE OF SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON HITS THE ROAD ON SPEAKING TOUR.

“Hillary Clinton will end up as one of those Mafia dons slumped in a wheelchair while the lawyers attempt to generate sympathy.




“But if she shows any sign of weakness, her cronies will begin to desert her, those she trampled on and harmed will seek payback, and the authorities will at last stir themselves to look into things. The current investigations will continue and expand. Others will be opened. Clinton can look forward to an old age spent in courthouses and committee rooms. She will end up as one of those Mafia dons slumped in a wheelchair while the lawyers attempt to generate sympathy. And that’s fine. She has earned the most Hellenic of punishments.”

“The Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came to power in Arkansas.  The list of scandals they have generated is long and tawdry.  Their principal goal then and now has always been to enrich themselves.  They never once had a moral compunction about lying, cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the Perons of America.  They eventually set up a "foundation" and the money kept rolling in.” THOMAS LIFSON / AMERICAN THINKER



No longer able to get half a million bucks for a brief speech before foreign interests seeking the favor of the American government, Bill and Hillary Clinton are going the concert tour route, hoping to cobble together another fortune built on selling a few thousand tickets per show, from about $70 to $750. THOMAS LIFSON / AMERICAN THINKER
Why is no one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after.
The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me.
Bill Clinton-12 women on record telling their stories of him sex-ually assa-ulting them starting back in college!
Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories about him?

Eileen Wellstone (1969)

Allegation: S-exual assault

Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)

Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)

Anonymous female lawyer (1977)

Juanita Broaddrick (1978)

R-ape

Carolyn Moffet (1979)

Elizabeth Ward (1983)

Sally Perdue (1983)

Paula Jones (1991)

Sandra Allen James (1991)

Christy Zercher (1992)

Kathleen Willey (1993)

Monica Lewinsky. 22 year old intern working for the President
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)