Clinton campaigns among the millionaires and billionaires
By Patrick Martin
23 August 2016
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton raised millions of dollars in a weekend of appearances at fundraising events on Martha’s Vineyard, Nantucket and Cape Cod, including one appearance with the singer Cher. All five events were invitation-only with the press excluded, so there is no public record of what Clinton said to the millionaires and multi-millionaires who flocked to see her.
This was the kickoff of a 10-day fundraising frenzy in which Clinton will crisscross the United States visiting the homes of the super-rich and the vacation resorts they frequent. After Saturday and Sunday in Massachusetts, she jetted across country for seven events over three days in California, including at the homes of former basketball star Earvin “Magic” Johnson, billionaire Haim Saban, Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel, and Apple CEO Tim Cook.
After a rally in Reno, Nevada, Clinton will jet back to the east for several more days of schmoozing in the Hamptons, at the ritzy eastern end of Long Island.
From August 20 through August 31, Clinton will make two public appearances, but will attend 54 fundraising events, many with an admission price tag of $27,000. The expected take will be in the tens of millions, padding her already huge lead over Republican Donald Trump in that most important of contests, the chase after cash.
While Trump regularly boasts of a $10 billion fortune, he has spent comparatively little of it since locking up the Republican presidential nomination in mid-May, and his campaign trails Clinton badly in both raising and spending money for the November 8 election.
Reports filed with the Federal Election Commission by both campaigns and various Democratic and Republican Party committees, as well as independent Political Action Committees (PACs) and super PACs, suggest that as far as the American financial aristocracy is concerned, Clinton is the overwhelming favorite to become the next US president.
The Clinton campaign raised $63 million in July, together with $26 million for two funds operated jointly with the Democratic Party and $10 million for her nominally independent super PAC, for a combined total of nearly $100 million. Clinton and her supporting funds and PACs began August with $140 million in the bank.
By contrast, the Trump campaign raised $36 million on its own account, $44 million in joint funds with the Republican National Committee, and only $4 million through super PACs, for a total income of $84 million. Trump and his supporting funds began August with $78 million in the bank, barely half the resources of the Democrats.
The FEC reports once again call into question whether Trump is even seriously participating in the election in the sense of seeking to maximize the number of votes he receives on November 8. His total campaign staff at the end of July was only 82, compared to more than 700 for Clinton. His campaign spent zero in July on television advertising.
Even more revealing, the Trump campaign spent no money in July on building an organization in the 11 so-called battleground states which will likely decide the outcome in the Electoral College—Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Nevada, Arizona and New Hampshire. (Virginia and Colorado, previously considered battleground states, now show double-digit leads for Clinton).
According to an analysis by USA Today, Clinton outraised Trump in 10 of those 11 states, in terms of total contributions from individuals who gave more than $200 at a time, a key measure of the support for her campaign among the wealthiest individuals in each area. (Campaigns are not required to disclose names and addresses of donors giving less than $200). In Pennsylvania, for example, Clinton raised three times as much as Trump in larger contributions.
For the last two full months before the election, September and October, the Clinton campaign has reserved $80 million in television advertising space in the battleground states. Trump has booked a total of less than $5 million, although his newly installed campaign manager Kellyanne Conway said there would be more ad purchases before the end of August.
The Trump campaign spent $18.4 million in July, less than half the $38 million laid out by the Clinton campaign. Half of that went for digital advertising, and nearly $2 million on campaign merchandise like hats. This followed an even greater disparity in June, when Clinton outspent Trump by better than four to one, $34 million to only $7.8 million.
These figures underscore what is beginning to be acknowledged even in the corporate media: Trump is not contesting the general election in any traditional sense, but has, instead, another purpose entirely. He is preparing the ground the launching of a fascist-type political movement in the United States, whether inside or outside the Republican Party.
Meanwhile Clinton’s status as the near-unanimous choice of Wall Street and the financial elite is confirmed by the tidal wave of cash flowing not only into her campaign directly, but into an array of PACs and super PACs aligned with the Democratic Party.
Billionaire currency speculator George Soros has resumed political donations after a long hiatus, pumping $14 million into various super PACs, while hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer has given $38 million over the past two years into his NextGen Climate Action Committee, which is opposing Trump.
The billionaire former Republican mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg, endorsed Clinton in a primetime speech at the Democratic National Convention and gave $5 million to his own super PAC to support candidates supporting gun control, including Clinton.
On the West Coast, the billionaire CEO of Hewlett-Packard, Meg Whitman, former Republican candidate for governor of California, announced her support for Clinton and a six-figure donation to her campaign.
By contrast Peter Thiel, the billionaire founder of PayPal who spoke at the Republican convention in support of Trump, has no plans either to donate or to raise money for the Republican nominee.
By one estimate, Clinton has raised $30 million from the communications and electronics industry, compared to $18 million for all Republican candidates defeated by Trump, and only $336,000 for Trump himself.
Clinton’s focus on mobilizing the financial backing of the super-rich provides yet another yardstick for measuring the pathetic bankruptcy of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who endorsed Clinton for the presidency after claiming that he was fighting for a “political revolution” against the “millionaires and billionaires” through a campaign within the Democratic Party.
The truth is that the wealthy control the Democratic Party just as surely and completely as they do the Republican Party, and perhaps even more so. They are not spending their money on Clinton so that she can realize the hopes of workers and youth who supported Sanders. On the contrary, they are rewarding a trusted servant who is about to be promoted to the top position within the capitalist state machine.
Hillary Collects Hollywood Cash at Haim Saban’s Beverly Hills Mansion
Hillary Clinton collected campaign cash and participated in a question-and-answer session at a dinner fundraiser held by billionaire entertainment mogul Haim Saban and his wife Cheryl at their Beverly Hills home Monday night.
Walt Disney Co. CEO Bob Iger, Chernin Group founder Peter Chernin, MarketShare CEO Jon Vein, former DreamWorks Animation chief Jeffrey Katzenberg, CAA agent Michael Kives and Los Angeles 2024 Olympics bid chief Casey Wasserman served as event co-chairs, according to Variety.
Actors Will Ferrell and Tony Goldwyn and Hewlett-Packard CEO and former California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman were also reportedly in attendance.
Attendees told Variety that Clinton discussed policy issues at the event, including infrastructure, education and the Clinton Foundation, reportedly emphasizing the good works the organization has done and reminding attendees that all recent presidents have set up charitable foundations.
Tickets for the event reportedly went for $100,000 per couple. Around 80 people attended, according to the outlet.
Saban — founder of Saban Entertainment, which became known in the 1990s for producing children’s television shows like Power Rangers — is one of the biggest entertainment industry contributors to both Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic Party. By February, he had donated $6.4 million between the campaign, pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA and smaller Democrat Party committees.
Earlier Monday, Clinton attended a $2,700 per-person fundraising event at the home of NBA legend Magic Johnson that reportedly drew more than 500 guests, including actors Denzel Washington and Samuel L. Jackson, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.
On Tuesday, Clinton is expected to attend a lunch fundraiser at the Los Angeles home of pop star Justin Timberlake and his wife, actress Jessica Biel. Attendees expected at the event include actors Jennifer Aniston and Tobey Maguire, ICM chief Chris Silbermann, agent Scooter Braun and manager Rick Yorn.
Clinton was expected to attend seven fundraisers in California in three days as part of anaggressive fundraising push before Labor Day weekend.
AMNESTY: IT'S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED
AND PASSING ALONG THE REAL COST (WELFARE & CRIME)
TO THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS!
"So, too, on these shores, our elite aim to imitate Merkel, from Obama, who aids and abets illegals, and who’s pushing the import of Syrians, to Paul Ryan (an elitist on the spectrum), who speaks of compassion and fairness toward illegals and Muslim refugees. Never mind they’ll be no costs attendant to the speaker. But Ryan isn’t merely being abstract. His favoring amnesty serves cheap-labor business interests at the expense of struggling citizens."
August 16, 2016
It Won’t End Well for Global Elites
Elections aren’t about finalities, they’re about processes. They may be about departures. Case in point, the 2016 presidential contests, which feature Hillary and The Donald. If Trump wins, the process of the November election might start a departure in more than politics. It could be historic. It won’t be good, however, for the global elites inhabiting New York, DC, Boston, and San Francisco -- or wherever else ivory towers, mahogany-paneled offices, pricey secured buildings, and gated communities are found. Trump’s election would have reverberations overseas, too, in London, Paris, Berlin -- yes, wherever else ivory towers, et al, are found.
A Hillary victory means there won’t be a departure; merely a doubling-down by the elite, as they act with renewed zest to secure their interests -- versus the national welfare. The Great Imposition -- a war waged on average Americans -- will continue with awful consequences.
Impose and divide – divide to conquer. Blacks against whites. (That’s more Milwaukees.) Hispanics against Anglos. (That’s more illegals and all legalized). Poor against rich. (Lots more free sh*t.) Takers versus producers. (Lots more free sh*t.) Marginalize the working class. (Further cede manufacturing to the Chinese; shut down coal and domestic energy production, generally.) Demean the middle classes. (Who knuckle-drag their bibles, guns, and backwater values through life.)
The worldview among many of our elite is anti-nation -- dare we say -- anti-American, anti-law and order, anti-tradition, anti-faith (with exceptions carved out for Islam), anti-durable values and enduring truths, like marriage between a man and woman, and family, as defined by a man, woman, and children. The elite, so very cosmopolitan, have evolved past antique beliefs and ways.
The dangers are domestic and foreign. President Hillary and anti-nation elites would continue failed policies toward Islamic militants and insurgencies. They’d serve up more perverse rationalizations for why Islam doesn’t animate jihadists. More dangers in the offing with rogue nations Iran and North Korea. Mounting danger in Asia, with China, where the PRC is boldly militarizing the South China Sea.
All pose existential threats, to one degree or another. To the elite? Obstacles to the world they’ve created for themselves. Perhaps to be solved with appeasements, like tribute (it worked for the Romans -- for a while.). Ransoms(monetary and otherwise). Accommodations. Retreats. Misdirection and outright lies.
Peggy Noonan just penned a brilliant analysis for the Wall Street Journal. She captured the global elite, nailing them to a “T.”
Referring to the nearly million Syrians (disproportionately males) admitted to Germany last year by Chancellor Angela Merkel, Noonan wrote:
But there was a fundamental problem with the decision that you can see rippling now throughout the West. Ms. Merkel had put the entire burden of a huge cultural change not on herself and those like her but on regular people who live closer to the edge, who do not have the resources to meet the burden, who have no particular protection or money or connections. Ms. Merkel, her cabinet and government, the media and cultural apparatus that lauded her decision were not in the least affected by it and likely never would be.Nothing in their lives will get worse. The challenge of integrating different cultures, negotiating daily tensions, dealing with crime and extremism and fearfulness on the street—that was put on those with comparatively little, whom I’ve called the unprotected.
More from Noonan:
The powerful show no particular sign of worrying about any of this. When the working and middle class pushed back in shocked indignation, the people on top called them “xenophobic,” “narrow-minded,” “racist.” The detached, who made the decisions and bore none of the costs, got to be called “humanist,” “compassionate,” and “hero of human rights.”
So, too, on these shores, our elite aim to imitate Merkel, from Obama, who aids and abets illegals, and who’s pushing the import of Syrians, to Paul Ryan (an elitist on the spectrum), who speaks of compassion and fairness toward illegals and Muslim refugees. Never mind they’ll be no costs attendant to the speaker. But Ryan isn’t merely being abstract. His favoring amnesty serves cheap-labor business interests at the expense of struggling citizens.
Mind you, a Trump victory bringing about a departure will come with disruptions and conflict aplenty. Wider political and societal changes invariably do. The drama of recentering America will play out over years. The progressives and New Dealers didn’t succeed in remaking society immediately. Both had epicenters: industrialization, World War I, and Wilson’s presidency for the progressives; the Great Depression for FDR and his New Dealers.
Trump represents an opportunity for a new direction -- a recreation and amalgam of two critical strains. One nationalist; in other words, a reemphasis on the preeminence of American interests and the American people. The other, conservative, as defined practically and politically by diminishing Washington’s power internally through reduction and decentralization, with much power returning to the states, localities, and citizens.
And companion social conservativism, which enlists Middle Americans to vigorously battle smothering -- elitist -- PC; which pushes for a reinvestment of traditional values and virtues in the culture and academy and arts; which counteracts cancerous and nihilistic relativism with bold proclamations for “eternal truths”… that asserts the right of the faithful to be openly, proudly faithful.
Ambitious? Right. We can’t afford not to be ambitious.
A Hillary win this November assures an exacerbation -- and likely, acceleration -- of troubles and conflict for a decaying, fractious society. Her victory would embolden the elite to greater highhandedness, to greater “bullying” and imposition of its worldview on citizens, who resent the trampling of their beliefs and values, and resent the elites’ notion that America is nothing more than an open-air mall, where anything and everything American can be sold, traded, bartered or discarded… where people’s livelihoods and welfare are subordinate to a global economy that mostly benefits the privileged... where nation and patriotism are dismissed as the province of yokels.
A Trump win would mark a departure, both destructive and creative. Global elites would have to find new ways in a new world. It’s not what they want. With Hillary, though, the fuse will burn down and the powder keg will blow sky-high. That’s when, not if. The consequences of an explosion are surely cataclysmic but, otherwise, unpredictable, with one exception: it won’t end well for global elites.
New Clinton Effort Tries to Tap the Power of ‘Dreamers’–AP
Alex Wong/Getty Images
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Clinton’s campaign is launching a new effort to tap into the political power of young, undocumented immigrants, hoping to capitalize on Donald Trump’s promises to make deporting them a top priority of his presidency.
The 730,000 young people brought to the
U.S. as children without legal status are
prohibited from voting. Known as Dreamers,
they’ve proven themselves to be a powerful
organizing force in American politics,
mounting a high-profile public campaign that
pressured President Barack Obama to grant
many of them and their parents reprieves
from deportation through two executive
orders.
U.S. as children without legal status are
prohibited from voting. Known as Dreamers,
they’ve proven themselves to be a powerful
organizing force in American politics,
mounting a high-profile public campaign that
pressured President Barack Obama to grant
many of them and their parents reprieves
from deportation through two executive
orders.
Clinton’s national voter registration program, called “Mi Sueño, Tu Voto/My Dream, Your Vote,” is being launched on the four-year anniversary of the 2012 order that temporarily shielded from deportation some young immigrants brought to the country illegally as children and allowed them to work legally.
Organizers will remind voters that a Trump presidency would end that program, according to the campaign, which is already at risk after a June Supreme Court effectively killed Obama’s efforts to give legal status to some of the 11 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally.
The program is part of an aggressive effort by Clinton’s campaign to woo the record 27.3 million Latinos eligible to vote in 2016. Polling shows Trump doing worse with Latino voters than any GOP presidential candidate since 1996. Much of the new effort will focus on battleground states including Colorado, Nevada, North Carolina and Florida, where Latinos and other immigrants make up an important part of the voting base.
Though Obama’s campaign had no formal organization program for Dreamers, door-knocking by those young immigrants, who have lived and attended school in the U.S., helped mobilize many Latino voters who could vote.
Clinton believes she can harness their power in a more formal way, particularly given her opponent. Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric has sparked outrage and fear within the Latino community.
He’s promised to revoke Obama’s executive orders within the first 100 days of his presidency, calling them the “most unconstitutional actions ever undertaken by a president.”
Clinton has made revamping the country’s immigration system a key plank of her presidential campaign. She has said she will introduce legislation during her first 100 days in office, vowed to restore and expand Obama’s programs, close private sector detention centers and to “take a very hard look at the deportation policies” now in force.
Last month, she called on Latino voters to help stop what she called GOP rival Donald Trump’s efforts to “fan the flames of racial division.”
“Donald Trump is running the most divisive campaign our lifetime. His message is that you should be afraid,” she told a gathering of Latino activists In Washington. “We’ve got to come back twice as strong and twice as clear. We have got to say with one voice that Latinos are vital part of the American community.”
The social roots of unrest in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
16 August 2016
Once again deeply rooted social anger has boiled over in an American city against police violence. This time protests erupted in the Sherman Park neighborhood of Milwaukee, Wisconsin following the killing of 23-year-old African American Sylville K. Smith by an as yet unidentified African American police officer Saturday afternoon.
Approximately 100 people gathered Saturday night to protest near where Smith was killed. The night ended with a handful of nearby businesses looted as well as a gas station, a bank branch and an auto parts store torched. A handful of cop cars and other vehicles were damaged or destroyed. The police arrested 31 people during protests Saturday and Sunday night.
At the request of Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, a prominent African American backer of Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has mobilized the National Guard. At least 100 members have been placed on standby to respond to protests if deemed necessary by city officials, adding to the 150 specially trained Milwaukee Police Department (MPD) officers and regular police patrols.
This marks the second time since 2014 that Walker has put the National Guard on notice for deployment in response to protests against police violence in the city. The National Guard, a branch of the military, has been used to put down popular protests in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014 and Baltimore, Maryland in 2015.
While the killing of Smith is the immediate cause of the protests in Milwaukee, it is clear that broader issues are involved—bound up not with racial divisions, but a one-sided class war waged by the American financial elite. Like so many cities in the United States, Milwaukee has been devastated by decades of deindustrialization and financialization, which has produced the highest levels of inequality since the 1920s. The factories that provided decent wages and benefits for tens of thousands of workers have all but disappeared.
The city lost three-quarters of its industrial jobs between 1960 and the 2010. The disappearance of manufacturing employment had a particular impact on black male workers in the city. From 1970 to 2010, the employment rate for black men aged 16 to 64 in the metro Milwaukee region fell precipitously, from 73.4 percent to only 44.7 percent.
The city’s overall poverty rate in 2014 was 29 percent, nearly double the national rate. Children and youth aged 18 and under were the worst affected, with more than 42 percent growing up poor. More than 43 percent of the population in the Sherman Park neighborhood lives below the poverty line.
It is fitting that President Barack Obama visited the Sherman Park area in 2012 where he spoke at the Master Lock factory, one of the few remaining industrial facilities in the area. Obama hailed Master Lock as a great example of the “insourcing” of low wage manufacturing jobs. In its more than seven years in office, the Obama administration has not proposed a single initiative or program that would begin to address the staggering levels of social inequality, poverty and unemployment in the United States.
The growth of poverty and inequality, the eruption of social anger and the build-up of the police forces are interrelated components of the same class dynamic. Whatever the role racism may play—a 2011 analysis of traffic stop data found that African American drivers were more than seven times as likely as white drivers to be pulled over by the MPD—the war waged by the American ruling class has been directed at the working class of all races.
In considering the issue of police violence, it is once again necessary to stress that the majority of those killed by police in the United States are white. As for the conditions that are fueling social anger, these transcend race as well. The majority of poor in the United States are white, and white workers have suffered some of the most disastrous declines in conditions of life over the past several decades. One only needs to cite the stunning rise in mortality rates among working class whites in recent years.
As for African Americans, one of the most significant if very little noted facts of American life is the extraordinary growth of social inequality within the African American population over the past four decades. A black family in the top 1 percent of the US population has a net worth 200 times the average black family, and the top 10 percent controls 67 of the wealth held by all African Americans.
In politics, African Americans have been elevated to positions of power by both the Democrats and Republicans—Obama, Loretta Lynch, Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell being some of the most notable. Many major American cities have had black mayors and city councils are populated by African American politicians.
Those promoting racial politics speak for this social layer of more privileged sections of the middle class and for sections of the ruling class itself whose interests are thoroughly hostile to those of African American workers and youth.
A genuine fight against police violence must proceed from an understanding of certain basic facts.
First, that police violence is the product not of racial animosity of “white America” against “black America,” but rather is a reflection of the nature of the state as an instrument of class rule. The build-up of police power, which is a component part of a vast apparatus of repression, from the military to the spying agencies, will be used against all social opposition to the policies of the financial aristocracy.
Second, all factions of the political establishment are committed to the defense of the police. In the 2016 elections, Trump and the Republicans are running on a program of “law and order” and calls for criminalization of opposition to police violence (expressed most ruthlessly by Milwaukee County Sheriff Clarke at the Republican National Convention last month).
Meanwhile Hillary Clinton and the Democrats hail the police while sickeningly and hypocritically exploiting the family members of the victims of police violence to promote racial identity politics. She is committed to continuing and extending the policies of the Obama administration—which means escalating the assault on the working class, expanding war abroad and doing nothing to halt the reign of police violence in the United States.
The fight against police violence means a fight against the society that creates it. It requires a political struggle to unify all sections of the working class, of all races, in a common fight against unemployment, poverty, inequality and the capitalist profit system.
Niles Niemuth
SNEAKING IN… .By invitation of Barack Obama
America’s OPEN BORDERS crisis in the age of global terrorism
OBAMA’S GIFT TO HILLARIA:
OPEN BORDERS AND A MILLION MEXICAN CRIMINAL LINNING UP TO VOTE FOR MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACY!
Most Americans (legals) would be appalled to know that from day one the Obomb has funded the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race” with U.S. tax dollars and this racist party has operated out of the white house under LA RAZA V.P. Cecilia Munoz.
THE OBAMA SOLUTION TO WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICA: OPEN BORDERS AND AMNESTY
The same period has seen a massive growth of social inequality, with income and wealth concentrated at the very top of American society to an extent not seen since the 1920s.
This study follows reports released over the past several months documenting rising mortality rates among US workers due to drug addiction and suicide, high rates of infant mortality, an overall leveling off of life expectancy, and a growing gap between the life expectancy of the bottom rung of income earners compared to those at the top.
THE CLINTON “JOBS” PLAN ENDORSED BY NARCOMEX
– IT’S CALLED AMNESTY!
Clinton, in the guise of a “jobs” and “infrastructure” program, promoted yet another scheme to hand out tax cuts and other incentives for companies to hire workers at poverty-level wages, with the trade unions brought in to keep the workers in line in return for a cut in the spoils.
OBAMA’S GIFT TO HILLARIA:
OPEN BORDERS AND A MILLION MEXICAN CRIMINAL LINNING UP TO VOTE FOR MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACY!
Most Americans (legals) would be appalled to know that from day one the Obomb has funded the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race” with U.S. tax dollars and this racist party has operated out of the white house under LA RAZA V.P. Cecilia Munoz.
OBAMA-CLINTONOMICS: You were wondering how many jobs went to illegals and how well Obama’s crony banksters have done???
The sputtering economic recovering under President Obama, the last to follow a major recession, has fallen way short of the average recovery and ranks as the worst since the 1930s Great Depression, according to a new report.
Had the recovery under Obama been the average of the 11 since the Depression, according to the report, family incomes would be $17,000 higher, six million fewer Americans would be in poverty, and there would be six million more jobs.
THE OBAMA-CLINTON ECONOMIC MELTDOWN ----- HOME OWNERSHIP – ECONOMIC MELTDOWN
THE OBAMA DOCTRINE: ABET CRONY BANKSTERS SO THEY CAN FINSISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS. KEEP BORDERS WIDE OPEN TO EASE MILLIONS OF MEX FLAG WAVERS INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE OFFICES AND VOTING BOOTHS, AND EXPAND THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS’ MARKETS IN AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS TO KILL OFF AMERICA’S WHITE POPULATION TO BUILD A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP FOR ONE BARACK OBAMA, THE “Hope & Change” HUCKSTER FROM CHICAGO.
"The decline in homeownership is one sign of the deep social crisis in the United States. As rents and housing costs have soared, spurred on by financial speculation that has enriched the ruling elites, incomes and jobs for most Americans have shriveled."
OBAMA-CLINTONOMICS TO SERVE THE SUPER RICH: The slow and painful death of America
"These figures present a scathing indictment of the social order that prevails in America, the world’s wealthiest country, whose government proclaims itself to be the globe’s leading democracy. They are just one manifestation of the human toll taken by the vast and all-pervasive inequality and mass poverty that dominates American society."
THE OBAMA SOLUTION TO WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICA: OPEN BORDERS AND AMNESTY
/
The same period has seen a massive growth of social inequality, with income and wealth concentrated at the very top of American society to an extent not seen since the 1920s.
This study follows reports released over the past several months documenting rising mortality rates among US workers due to drug addiction and suicide, high rates of infant mortality, an overall leveling off of life expectancy, and a growing gap between the life expectancy of the bottom rung of income earners compared to those at the top.
THE MEXICAN DRUS CARTELS HAVE GREATLY BENEFITED FROM BARACK OBAMA’S SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY.
THE CLINTON “JOBS” PLAN ENDORSED BY NARCOMEX – IT’S CALLED AMNESTY!
Clinton, in the guise of a “jobs” and “infrastructure” program, promoted yet another scheme to hand out tax cuts and other incentives for companies to hire workers at poverty-level wages, with the trade unions brought in to keep the workers in line in return for a cut in the spoils.
THE OBAMA DOCTRINE: ABET CRONY BANKSTERS SO THEY CAN FINSISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS. KEEP BORDERS WIDE OPEN TO EASE MILLIONS OF MEX FLAG WAVERS INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE OFFICES AND VOTING BOOTHS, AND EXPAND THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS’ MARKETS IN AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS TO KILL OFF AMERICA’S WHITE POPULATION TO BUILD A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP FOR ONE BARACK OBAMA, THE “Hope & Change” HUCKSTER FROM CHICAGO.
"The decline in homeownership is one sign of the deep social crisis in the United States. As rents and housing costs have soared, spurred on by financial speculation that has enriched the ruling elites, incomes and jobs for most Americans have shriveled."
LA RAZA SUPREMACIST OBOMB FLOODS AMERICA WITH ILLEGALS!
THE OBAMA-CLINTON AMNESTY KEEPS WAGES DEPRESSED, DESTROYS THE
AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS AND BUILDS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S LA RAZA
PARTY BASE OF MEXICAN FLAG WAVERS.
"More than 728,000 illegal immigrants have been shielded from being deported and
granted work permits through President Barack Obama’s 2012 executive amnesty
program, according to the Migration Policy Institute."
AMERICA'S ROAD TO REVOLUTION
…..will pass right through Hillary Clinton’s Mansion door!
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan THE AMERICAN THINKER.com
30 REASONS FOR 30 YEARS IN PRISON FOR HILLARY!
THE UGLY, SORDID, CORRUPT AND SLEAZY LIFE OF BILLARY AND HILLARY CLINTON:Thirty reasons not to vote for Hillary
She would make a terrible president and Bill an equally terrible “First Gentleman” for these thirty reasons.
No comments:
Post a Comment