Crooked Hillary just won't slither away
On the September 18, 2018 Rachel Maddow show, Hillary warned us that Trump will "wholesale fire people" after the November 2018 elections.
Hillary, who "forgets" anything that contradicts truth and reality, must have forgotten that she fired the White House travel office so she could give the business to her pals. The White House memo that implicates her includes the following:
Mr. Watkins wrote that "we both know that there would be hell to pay if we failed to take swift and decisive action in conformity with the First Lady's wishes."
Hillary also "forgot" that during her co-presidency, she and Bill fired all 93 U.S. attorneys in one day. Jeff Sessions was one of those fired by Janet Reno.
Next, Hillary gave us her advice on how to handle the accusation made by Christine Ford against Judge Kavanaugh. Hillary said the vote should be delayed to have the FBI investigate:
Because what they have done, as her lawyers point out, is put Dr. Ford in the position of having to make her case without any kind of investigation that could be either helpful or detrimental to her[.] ... And I think she's asking that she be given the courtesy of having some facts laid out.Give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country and that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote, if appropriate[.]
Hillary, who spent her career covering up the sexual misconduct of her husband, Bill, and the rape of Juanita Broaddrick, now lectures us on investigating charges of sexual misconduct. She sicced James Carville to say about Paula Jones, "If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find."
She called Gennifer Flowers trailer trash. She called Monica Lewinsky a narcissistic loon. She smeared a twelve-year-old girl when she defended the girl's rapist. She referred to Bill's accusers as a bimbo eruption. She threatened Juanita Broaddrick. She said she would crucify Gennifer Flowers in cross-exam. She said they had to destroy the story of another accuser.
Rachel Maddow forgot to ask Hillary about these inconvenient facts.
Kenneth Starr did not do his job to indict Hillary for perjury. Starr said he drafted an indictment with a prosecution memo to indict Hillary for perjury because she answered, "I don't know, or I don't remember" over one hundred times during her deposition.
Had Starr done his job, we would have been spared Senator Hillary, secretary of state Hillary, Benghazi, the sale of 20% of our uranium to Russia, and most importantly the Hillary email scandal with the coverup by the Obama FBI and DOJ that included the sabotage of the Trump campaign and presidency.
Simply put, Hillary has no shame, no conscience. She has poisoned American politics and culture.
Ken Starr in New Book: Hillary and Bill Clinton ‘Fundamentally Dishonest’
The man whose investigation led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton for lying under oath about his sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky has now written a memoir about his days as independent counsel where he claims that Clinton and his wife, Hillary, are ‘fundamentally dishonest.”
National Public Radio highlighted that description on Tuesday when Morning Editionhost Steve Inskeep interviewed Starr about the book, entitled Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation.
Inskeep, however, was not interested in finding out why the Clintons are dishonest but wanted Starr to trash the current president, Donald J. Trump.
“You described the Clintons as fundamentally dishonest,” Inskeep said. “Is our current president fundamentally dishonest?”
“Well, I’m not going to opine on the president,” Starr said. “Let’s get all the facts in.”
“I have all the facts in with respect to Bill and Hillary. And that’s what ‘Contempt’ is all about. But I do think that there are echoes. We want our president to be honest. And we especially want the president to be honest under oath.”
Inskeep kept up the anti-Trump theme of the interview.
“What have you thought about, now that Republicans – the same party – have become overwhelmingly supportive of a president who’s been documented making thousands of false statements?” Inskeep asked.
Starr said it’s worth having a “serious conversation” about what is expected of presidents regarding their conduct and whether they are acting as if they above the rule of law.
“But here’s a key distinction,” Starr said. “At least as far as we know, Donald Trump has not lied under oath.’
“As far as we know, he’s not intimidated witnesses,” Starr said. “As far as we know, in my view, he has not obstructed justice. So…”
Inskeep pressed on, saying Trump has criticized Robert Mueller, who is investigating him in the way Starr investigated Clinton.
“Steve, right now in that the president tweets these nasty things and yet, from everything that appears, he’s cooperating fully with the investigation. Bill Clinton said he was ….”
Inskeep interrupted Starr again: “He hasn’t agreed to be interviewed yet, so far as we know.”
“But they produced thousands of documents,” Starr said, adding that the investigation will likely conclude soon.
“And of course, now it appears that Bob Mueller is not even asking for an interview,” Starr said. “He’s simply saying written questions – which, by the way, suggests to me that the entire investigation, at least as it affects this president, is winding down.”
Inskeep pointed out that Starr is critical of Clinton’s Attorney General Janet Reno in the book for not publicly supporting his investigation and turned the topic to Trump once again.
“She didn’t speak up,” Inskeep said. “And you found that to be cowardly, which does make me wonder — what do you think now that President Trump publicly calls the investigation surrounding him a witch hunt, regularly calls it that on a regular basis?”
Starr cited an op-ed he wrote in the Washington Post that said Trump should not criticize anyone in the Department of Justice.
But if Starr failed to completely trash Trump while being interviewed for a book about the Clintons, he did get to point out that the former president actually did act as if he were above the law.
Inskeep asked if his investigation into the Clintons was “worth it.”
“Well, of course, it was worth it because we had to have in our system – and the point I’m making in ‘Contempt’ is that no one is above the law.”
“But I also think, also, that while history may focus on perjury, what we’re really talking about ultimately is obstruction of justice and the abuse of power,” Starr said. “The abuse of power is laid out in the book, and people will come to their own judgments.”
“But in our view – all of us in the investigation involved — believed that the president had abused his power, and that was a view that we uniformly shared,” Starr said.
Follow Penny Starr on Twitter
Pelosi: President Clinton ‘Ushered in Transformative Progress to Protect Women from…Abuse’
Former President Bill Clinton and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Feb. 11, 2009. (Screen Capture)
(CNSNews.com) - In a statement released Thursday to mark the 24th anniversary of President Bill Clinton’s signing of the Violence Against Women Act, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi praised Clinton for protecting women.
“Twenty-four years ago, President Clinton signed the historic Violence Against Women Act and ushered in transformative progress to protect women from violence and abuse,” she said.
Here is the full text of Pelosi’s statement:
San Francisco – Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement to mark the 24th anniversary of the enactment of the landmark Violence Against Women Act legislation, which President Bill Clinton signed into law on September 13, 1994:
“Twenty-four years ago, President Clinton signed the historic Violence Against Women Act and ushered in transformative progress to protect women from violence and abuse. Almost a quarter century later, VAWA continues to provide critical support to victims, survivors and communities to work to better ensure they have the resources necessary to seek justice and receive care.
“All women deserve to be safe from violence whether at home, work, school or anywhere in our society. Yet, five years ago, House Republicans spent 18 months fighting to prevent an inclusive VAWA reauthorization from being enacted into law, in an appalling attempt to exclude immigrant, LGBTQ and Native American women from the law’s vital protections. Fortunately, Democrats fought relentlessly until Congress passed a strong VAWA reauthorization that protects every woman, even while more than 60 percent of House Republicans voted ‘no’ on the final, inclusive bill.
“And now, with just four legislative days left before VAWA’s provisions are set to expire on September 30, House Republicans have announced no plan for reauthorizing VAWA for another five years. Republicans should bring the strong VAWA Reauthorization Act of 2018 introduced by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee to the House Floor immediately. This commonsense reauthorization bill has the support of the nonpartisan groups that are focused on violence against women issues and deserves strong bipartisan support.
“Republicans should work with Democrats in getting Rep. Jackson-Lee’s VAWA Reauthorization Act enacted into law. If the House GOP can make time to vote on yet another GOP tax scam for the rich, they must not leave Washington at the end of September without having passed this vital VAWA reauthorization into law. Democrats are determined to continue to fight For The People to ensure that every woman in every place can live free from violence.”
The Legal Advisor for Kavanaugh’s Accuser Is a Big Time Democratic Donor, Thinks People Who Work for Trump Are 'Miscreants'
The Washington Post reported this afternoon that Stanford professor Christine Blasey Ford is the woman behind the confidential letter given to Sen. Dianne Feinstein accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault as a teenager. According to the Post, Ford initially refrained from revealing the alleged information of a horrendous sexual assault due to privacy concerns for herself and her family. But she thought it was her duty to come forward on the record after the advice of Washington lawyer Debra Katz. Katz, however, has a long history of dismissing sexual assault allegations against liberal politicians, donating to left-wing causes, and even publicly demonizing all Trump advisors as "miscreants" who are worse than deplorables.
Ford kept the following account to herself until a 2012 couples' therapy session and declined to initially name Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge according to her therapist's notes from the appointment:
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County.While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house.
Over the summer of 2018, as it became apparent that Kavanaugh was going to be nominated for the Supreme Court, Ford debated whether she should come forward publicly with this information. According to the Post, Ford "engaged Debra Katz, a Washington lawyer known for her work on sexual harassment cases. On the advice of Katz, who believed Ford would be attacked as a liar if she came forward, Ford took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent in early August."
After Sen. Feinstein announced the accusatory letter last week, Ford decided she had to come on the record to avoid public scrutiny and speculation. It was Katz who provided the results of that polygraph test to the Post. The results "concluded that Ford was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate."
Ken Starr in New Book: Hillary and Bill Clinton ‘Fundamentally Dishonest’
The man whose investigation led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton for lying under oath about his sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky has now written a memoir about his days as independent counsel where he claims that Clinton and his wife, Hillary, are ‘fundamentally dishonest.”
National Public Radio highlighted that description on Tuesday when Morning Editionhost Steve Inskeep interviewed Starr about the book, entitled Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation.
Inskeep, however, was not interested in finding out why the Clintons are dishonest but wanted Starr to trash the current president, Donald J. Trump.
“You described the Clintons as fundamentally dishonest,” Inskeep said. “Is our current president fundamentally dishonest?”
“Well, I’m not going to opine on the president,” Starr said. “Let’s get all the facts in.”
“I have all the facts in with respect to Bill and Hillary. And that’s what ‘Contempt’ is all about. But I do think that there are echoes. We want our president to be honest. And we especially want the president to be honest under oath.”
Inskeep kept up the anti-Trump theme of the interview.
“What have you thought about, now that Republicans – the same party – have become overwhelmingly supportive of a president who’s been documented making thousands of false statements?” Inskeep asked.
Starr said it’s worth having a “serious conversation” about what is expected of presidents regarding their conduct and whether they are acting as if they above the rule of law.
“But here’s a key distinction,” Starr said. “At least as far as we know, Donald Trump has not lied under oath.’
“As far as we know, he’s not intimidated witnesses,” Starr said. “As far as we know, in my view, he has not obstructed justice. So…”
Inskeep pressed on, saying Trump has criticized Robert Mueller, who is investigating him in the way Starr investigated Clinton.
“Steve, right now in that the president tweets these nasty things and yet, from everything that appears, he’s cooperating fully with the investigation. Bill Clinton said he was ….”
Inskeep interrupted Starr again: “He hasn’t agreed to be interviewed yet, so far as we know.”
“But they produced thousands of documents,” Starr said, adding that the investigation will likely conclude soon.
“And of course, now it appears that Bob Mueller is not even asking for an interview,” Starr said. “He’s simply saying written questions – which, by the way, suggests to me that the entire investigation, at least as it affects this president, is winding down.”
Inskeep pointed out that Starr is critical of Clinton’s Attorney General Janet Reno in the book for not publicly supporting his investigation and turned the topic to Trump once again.
“She didn’t speak up,” Inskeep said. “And you found that to be cowardly, which does make me wonder — what do you think now that President Trump publicly calls the investigation surrounding him a witch hunt, regularly calls it that on a regular basis?”
Starr cited an op-ed he wrote in the Washington Post that said Trump should not criticize anyone in the Department of Justice.
But if Starr failed to completely trash Trump while being interviewed for a book about the Clintons, he did get to point out that the former president actually did act as if he were above the law.
Inskeep asked if his investigation into the Clintons was “worth it.”
“Well, of course, it was worth it because we had to have in our system – and the point I’m making in ‘Contempt’ is that no one is above the law.”
“But I also think, also, that while history may focus on perjury, what we’re really talking about ultimately is obstruction of justice and the abuse of power,” Starr said. “The abuse of power is laid out in the book, and people will come to their own judgments.”
“But in our view – all of us in the investigation involved — believed that the president had abused his power, and that was a view that we uniformly shared,” Starr said.
Follow Penny Starr on Twitter
IT WAS BILL CLINTON WHO
UNLEASHED WALL STREET’S
BIGGEST CRIMINAL BANKSTERS….
And haven’t they sucked up the
banksters’ gratuities since?
Only Barack Obama has serviced banksters more than Hillary and Billary!
“Clinton also failed to mention how he
and Hillary cashed in after his
presidential tenure to
make themselves multimillionaires, in
part by taking tens of millions
in speaking fees from Wall Street
bankers.”
Leaked Julian Assange Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected, Sadistic Sociopath’
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
HILLARY CLINTON:
SEEING 30 YEARS OF PRISON TIME!
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY –
AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
LOOKING LIKE 30 YEARS FOR HILLARY CLINTON …. OBAMA MAY FOLLOW HER!
MICHAEL BARONE
“The Lawlessness of the Obama Administration: A never-ending story.”
No comments:
Post a Comment