Many workers and youth who rallied behind
Sanders will come to see his campaign as proof of
the impossibility of transforming the Democratic
Party, one of the two main parties of Wall Street
and the military/intelligence establishment, into an
instrument of progressive change, and the
essentially reactionary role of all those who claim
otherwise.
Hillary & Billary….. Operating like third
world dictators sucking in the bribes from every criminal and sleaze bag they
know and they know all of them!
Hillary Clinton Signals LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
Cecilia Munoz will make a great Vice President. Munoz is endorsed by Mexico.
CECILIA
MUNOZ, A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST FASCIST, IS FUNDED WITH AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS AND
WORKS FOR LA RAZA OUT OF THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE (google it).
NEW YORK
TIMES (MEX-OWNED MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA PROPAGANDA)
Cecilia Munoz - Formerly of the 'Tan Klan' now works in Intra-government Affairs for the White House
Radical Mexican Reconquista zealot Munoz speaking at a soiree
thrown by the miserable ADL.
From the New
York Times - October 22, 2000thrown by the miserable ADL.
Despite the
fact that the majority of documented Hispanics oppose illegal immigration, as
do the majority of Americans, Aztlan and La Raza race hate groups have become
the self-appointed voice for a separatist movement that threatens a violent
overthrow of the Constitutional system and a barbaric program of ethnic
cleansing. This is held up by the media as 'diversity' and to vociferously
oppose it is scorned as racism. Aztlan and Mecha groups advocate killing all whites and blacks and driving them out of the southern states by means of brutal ethnic cleansing.
oppose it is scorned as racism. Aztlan and Mecha groups advocate killing all whites and blacks and driving them out of the southern states by means of brutal ethnic cleansing.
Islamism is the great evil of our age….
“Instead, with the
aid of our media and Internet, we greet each new act of
Islamic murder
with a show of lies and anger. The Left is in charge of the lies.
They tell us,
in Hillary Clinton’s absurd words, that “Muslims . . . have nothing
whatsoever
to do with terrorism.”
The second
comes from “Shep” on a Disqus comment at Scott Adams’s blog. It is particularly poignant today, in the wake of
Hillary calling out the Saudis for funding radical Islam, and posing as a
friend of gays:
FUNDED
BY MUSLIM DICTATORS, CRIMINAL BILLIONAIRES, AND OBAMA’S CRONY BANKSTERS!
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/05/the-road-to-revolution-will-go-through.html
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/06/hillary_hilarity.html#ixzz4BZOsWEMQ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/06/hillary_hilarity.html#ixzz4BZOsWEMQ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
IMAGES OF AMERICA AFTER THE
FINAL
SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS TO NARCOMEX
AND THE TAKING OF THE GOVERNMENT BY
THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY OF LA RAZA “The Race”.
THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY OF LA RAZA “The Race”.
Now we have Candidate
Clinton promising even more aggressive
executive immigration amnesty than Obama.
Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning!"
Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning!"
HER
ABYSMAL RECORD OF SELF-ENRICHING CORRUPTION AND INCOMPETENCE
ABYSMAL RECORD OF SELF-ENRICHING CORRUPTION AND INCOMPETENCE
"The facts known
about Secretary Hillary Clinton’s actions surrounding the use of an unsecure
private email server for conducting State Department business, show that she
acted with reckless disregard of the security interests of the United States
and violated some ten federal statutes."
and violated some ten federal statutes."
"The Clintons used this as a way to launder foreign donations (which would be illegal if they were campaign donations) to finance her campaign in absentia."
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/06/dedicated-servant-of-wall-street.html
THE ROAD OF REVOLUTION WILL PASS
THROUGH HILLARY CLINTON’S MANSION
THROUGH HILLARY CLINTON’S MANSION
DOOR!
"The country is now at the edge of
an abyss following years of obfuscation, unaccountability,
subterfuge, and law evasion by the Obama
administration that have numbed much of its citizenry
into a kind of base “group think
acceptance” of government corruption and abuse of
power. Resetting Americans’ trust
in government needs to start with holding people in high
office, like Hillary Clinton,
accountable."
THE MANY SLEAZY, SHADY, GREEDY,
RUTHLESS AND PERVERTED LIVES OF
HILLARY AND BILLARY….. America’s Juan
and Evita Peron!
Clinton Cash investigates how Bill and Hillary Clinton went from being “dead broke” after leaving the White House to amassing a net worth of over $150 million, with $2 billion in donations to their foundation, wealth accumulated during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as Sec. of
State through lucrative speaking fees and contracts paid for by foreign companies and Clinton Foundation donors.
May 28, 2016
Hillary Clinton -- Career Criminal
Hillary Clinton -- Career Criminal
At the
conclusion of an
article on the State Department IG’s findings
that Hillary Clinton brazenly violated federal record-keeping statutes, National
Review’s Andrew McCarthy asks:
“What
are we to make of Mrs. Clinton’s public posturing that of course
[emphasis in original] she is prepared to cooperate -- and encourages her
subordinates to cooperate -- with government investigators?”
are we to make of Mrs. Clinton’s public posturing that of course
[emphasis in original] she is prepared to cooperate -- and encourages her
subordinates to cooperate -- with government investigators?”
The
question is obviously rhetorical, but one problem with rhetorical questions is
that we don’t always really answer them, other than shrugging. So allow me
in this case to answer that question. What we are to make of Mrs. Clinton
is that she is an accomplished career criminal -- and I mean that literally,
not rhetorically.
question is obviously rhetorical, but one problem with rhetorical questions is
that we don’t always really answer them, other than shrugging. So allow me
in this case to answer that question. What we are to make of Mrs. Clinton
is that she is an accomplished career criminal -- and I mean that literally,
not rhetorically.
Like a
lot of accomplished career criminals Mrs. Clinton has committed so many high
crimes and misdemeanors, and gotten away with them to boot, that we tend to
forget (or ignore) past acts of lawlessness because the new ones keep on
coming. And like skillful felons the world over, Mrs. Clinton takes full
advantage of this very human inclination, by sloughing off past accusations as
“old news” or the result of biases that have emerged through
“misunderstandings.” Anyone who has worked in criminal justice has seen this
phenomenon, where repeat offenders get to know police, prosecutors and judges
so well that law enforcement tires of them -- maybe even comes to like them a
bit -- and so cut the career criminal a break. And the clever crook knows this
tendency and plays upon it. It’s this dynamic that led to the development
of “three strikes” laws, so such crooks don’t receive unearned or plainly
manipulated sympathy.
lot of accomplished career criminals Mrs. Clinton has committed so many high
crimes and misdemeanors, and gotten away with them to boot, that we tend to
forget (or ignore) past acts of lawlessness because the new ones keep on
coming. And like skillful felons the world over, Mrs. Clinton takes full
advantage of this very human inclination, by sloughing off past accusations as
“old news” or the result of biases that have emerged through
“misunderstandings.” Anyone who has worked in criminal justice has seen this
phenomenon, where repeat offenders get to know police, prosecutors and judges
so well that law enforcement tires of them -- maybe even comes to like them a
bit -- and so cut the career criminal a break. And the clever crook knows this
tendency and plays upon it. It’s this dynamic that led to the development
of “three strikes” laws, so such crooks don’t receive unearned or plainly
manipulated sympathy.
Donald
Trump’s recent
faux pas regarding
the long-ago apparent suicide of Clinton confidant Vince Foster is an example
of this process. Trump, as is his wont, made a poorly thought-out off-the-cuff
remark suggesting that Foster was murdered, and that Clinton was behind
it. Since this is one crime that the Clintons probably did not commit,
Trump’s remark was foolish, since, like accusations about Obama’s birthplace,
it just gives the leftist media ammunition to belittle legitimate criticisms.
But it was also understandable -- Trump didn’t claim the accusations were true,
only that he was aware of them, and given we’re talking about Hillary Clinton,
well…
Trump’s recent
faux pas regarding
the long-ago apparent suicide of Clinton confidant Vince Foster is an example
of this process. Trump, as is his wont, made a poorly thought-out off-the-cuff
remark suggesting that Foster was murdered, and that Clinton was behind
it. Since this is one crime that the Clintons probably did not commit,
Trump’s remark was foolish, since, like accusations about Obama’s birthplace,
it just gives the leftist media ammunition to belittle legitimate criticisms.
But it was also understandable -- Trump didn’t claim the accusations were true,
only that he was aware of them, and given we’re talking about Hillary Clinton,
well…
But
Trump needn’t speculate about Foster’s fate, nor should we. Rather than trying
to pin Foster’s death on Hillary, he ought to remind the public of her other
crimes, and launch focused attacks on her documented and provable malfeasances,
starting with her cattle futures trading windfall/bribe. Today, Hillary’s
cattle trading is usually mentioned casually as an indicator of how far back Hillary’s
corruption goes, but that crime (from 1978/79) itself is worth revisiting in
some detail.
Trump needn’t speculate about Foster’s fate, nor should we. Rather than trying
to pin Foster’s death on Hillary, he ought to remind the public of her other
crimes, and launch focused attacks on her documented and provable malfeasances,
starting with her cattle futures trading windfall/bribe. Today, Hillary’s
cattle trading is usually mentioned casually as an indicator of how far back Hillary’s
corruption goes, but that crime (from 1978/79) itself is worth revisiting in
some detail.
Like
most of Hillary’s wrongdoing, she benefits from the fact that her schemes are
complex, superficially boring, and often hard for the general public to understand.
In that sense it’s understandable that Trump fell into the trap of talking
about the Foster case. Murder and/or suicide is comprehensible and sexy,
trading livestock is not. That doesn’t change the fact that Hillary’s $100,000
trading windfall cannot reasonably be seen as anything but a criminal
bribe.
most of Hillary’s wrongdoing, she benefits from the fact that her schemes are
complex, superficially boring, and often hard for the general public to understand.
In that sense it’s understandable that Trump fell into the trap of talking
about the Foster case. Murder and/or suicide is comprehensible and sexy,
trading livestock is not. That doesn’t change the fact that Hillary’s $100,000
trading windfall cannot reasonably be seen as anything but a criminal
bribe.
Anybody
that knows anything about trading commodities understands that what Hillary
claims to have done -- turn an initial $1000 investment in cattle futures into
a $100,000 profit ten months later -- is as a practical matter almost
impossible even for the most skilled commodity operator, and absolutely
impossible for a neophyte such as Hillary was. My father traded
commodities for decades, was very smart, reasonably good at it, and even ran an
advisory service for a time. He managed to stay ahead but not by
much. Three quarters of commodity traders lose money, the vast majority
inexperienced traders like Clinton.
that knows anything about trading commodities understands that what Hillary
claims to have done -- turn an initial $1000 investment in cattle futures into
a $100,000 profit ten months later -- is as a practical matter almost
impossible even for the most skilled commodity operator, and absolutely
impossible for a neophyte such as Hillary was. My father traded
commodities for decades, was very smart, reasonably good at it, and even ran an
advisory service for a time. He managed to stay ahead but not by
much. Three quarters of commodity traders lose money, the vast majority
inexperienced traders like Clinton.
An
inexperienced blackjack player would have a much, much easier time turning a
$1000 stake at a casino into $100,000, than would a similarly situated person
in futures trading, though of course such a blackjack run would require almost
perfect play. What Hillary claims to have done would have required divine
intervention, or a criminal scheme. Since I am fairly sure the Almighty is not
on her side, we need to go with the latter.
inexperienced blackjack player would have a much, much easier time turning a
$1000 stake at a casino into $100,000, than would a similarly situated person
in futures trading, though of course such a blackjack run would require almost
perfect play. What Hillary claims to have done would have required divine
intervention, or a criminal scheme. Since I am fairly sure the Almighty is not
on her side, we need to go with the latter.
After
the trading scheme became public in the 1990s, Clinton and her defenders tried
to explain the windfall away as a combination of Hillary’s native intelligence,
luck, and good advice. But a scholarly paper put out in 1994 by the Journal
of Economics and Finance calculated that
the odds of gaining such a profit in ten months
under conditions at the time, and giving the investor the benefit of the doubt,
at 31 trillion to 1. By way of comparison, the odds that the blood
detected on O.J. Simpson’s notorious glove (found after the murders at
Simpson’s estate), did not contain the blood of his victims is between 21 and 41 billion
chances in one. Thus, at least by this metric, it
is far, far more likely that O.J. Simpson is innocent of the murders of Ron
Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, than it is that Hillary’s cattle futures
profit was not illegal. Even a bored, inattentive and not very bright
electorate can understand that. And I understand that some people never will
understand it no matter what, which is why O.J. walked.
the trading scheme became public in the 1990s, Clinton and her defenders tried
to explain the windfall away as a combination of Hillary’s native intelligence,
luck, and good advice. But a scholarly paper put out in 1994 by the Journal
of Economics and Finance calculated that
the odds of gaining such a profit in ten months
under conditions at the time, and giving the investor the benefit of the doubt,
at 31 trillion to 1. By way of comparison, the odds that the blood
detected on O.J. Simpson’s notorious glove (found after the murders at
Simpson’s estate), did not contain the blood of his victims is between 21 and 41 billion
chances in one. Thus, at least by this metric, it
is far, far more likely that O.J. Simpson is innocent of the murders of Ron
Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, than it is that Hillary’s cattle futures
profit was not illegal. Even a bored, inattentive and not very bright
electorate can understand that. And I understand that some people never will
understand it no matter what, which is why O.J. walked.
The
futures trading incident is also notable in that after the scheme became a
legal and political issue, Hillary’s cool reaction to it proved to be her
coming out party as an effective mob boss who could handle herself under
intense pressure and scrutiny. She was widely
praised in the liberal press for being
forthcoming and unflappable, while also giving no ground, a pattern that would
repeat itself again and again, up to the present.
futures trading incident is also notable in that after the scheme became a
legal and political issue, Hillary’s cool reaction to it proved to be her
coming out party as an effective mob boss who could handle herself under
intense pressure and scrutiny. She was widely
praised in the liberal press for being
forthcoming and unflappable, while also giving no ground, a pattern that would
repeat itself again and again, up to the present.
Hillary’s
cattle futures bribery scheme dates back to the same time frame as she began
her other introductory criminal scam, Whitewater. From
there came the Rose Law Firm billing records
scandal (related to Whitewater), Travelgate, Hillary’s libels against victims
of her husband’s predatory sexual behavior, Troopergate (related to Bill’s
dalliances), the White House’s missing furniture, the friendly mortgage for the
house in Chappaqua, a carpet-bagging Senate run, the Clinton Foundation, pay
for play speeches, Benghazi, and the email scandals. (I may have missed
one or two others.)
cattle futures bribery scheme dates back to the same time frame as she began
her other introductory criminal scam, Whitewater. From
there came the Rose Law Firm billing records
scandal (related to Whitewater), Travelgate, Hillary’s libels against victims
of her husband’s predatory sexual behavior, Troopergate (related to Bill’s
dalliances), the White House’s missing furniture, the friendly mortgage for the
house in Chappaqua, a carpet-bagging Senate run, the Clinton Foundation, pay
for play speeches, Benghazi, and the email scandals. (I may have missed
one or two others.)
It is a
breathtaking history of scandal and criminality that might make Tony Soprano
blush, and is certainly the envy of real life mob bosses cooling their heels in
penitentiaries jail across the nation. Hillary simply has almost all the
traits (and history) of a successful mob boss, including a close knit group of
loyal confederates who operate under a code of omerta.
breathtaking history of scandal and criminality that might make Tony Soprano
blush, and is certainly the envy of real life mob bosses cooling their heels in
penitentiaries jail across the nation. Hillary simply has almost all the
traits (and history) of a successful mob boss, including a close knit group of
loyal confederates who operate under a code of omerta.
Trump
has many flaws, but to my knowledge he is not an outright criminal, much less a
mob boss. Trump needn’t concern himself with Vince Foster. He does
need to thoughtfully
and aggressively hone his attack on Hillary’s
enduring criminality. There is plenty to work with.
has many flaws, but to my knowledge he is not an outright criminal, much less a
mob boss. Trump needn’t concern himself with Vince Foster. He does
need to thoughtfully
and aggressively hone his attack on Hillary’s
enduring criminality. There is plenty to work with.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/hillary_clinton__career_criminal.html#ixzz49xqSEmD2
No comments:
Post a Comment