California governor backs Clinton in Democratic primary
By Patrick Martin
1 June 2016
One week before the June 7 California primary, with the presidential campaign of Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton floundering, Governor Jerry Brown dropped his pretense of neutrality and publicly endorsed her.Brown’s endorsement adds to those of California’s two senators, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, both of whom have done what they can to bolster Clinton’s declining poll numbers.
Brown posted online an “Open Letter to California Democrats and Independents” on Tuesday, in which he declared that Clinton had an insurmountable lead and should be ratified as the Democratic presidential nominee.
The statement from Brown praised Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, saying, “He has driven home the message that the top one percent has unfairly captured way too much of America’s wealth, leaving the majority of people far behind. In 1992, I attempted a similar campaign.” He should now, Brown implies, bring to an end the basic purpose of his campaign, to channel opposition behind a Clinton nomination.
Brown was referring to his own unsuccessful presidential bid in 1992, which actually did little to raise the issue of social inequality. In the course of that campaign, however, Brown did point to the corrupt ties between Bill and Hillary Clinton and sections of big business, including the Arkansas-based Wal-mart, the largest private employer in the United States.
Brown himself is a thoroughly right-wing and anti-working-class political figure, closely identified with austerity policies that make balancing the budget and creating a good “business climate”—i.e., promoting profits at the expense of workers—the principal goal of state government.
He has reneged on all the promises made during the 2010 election campaign to reverse the policies of Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, despite top-heavy Democratic Party majorities in both houses of the state legislature.
The argument made by Brown for supporting Hillary Clinton now was almost entirely procedural: she has won the most delegates and votes. “Clinton’s lead is insurmountable and Democrats have shown—by millions of votes—that they want her as their nominee.”
Citing the threat of Republican nominee Donald Trump, and his extreme right-wing pronouncements denouncing immigrants and denying climate change, Brown concluded, “This is no time for Democrats to keep fighting each other. The general election has already begun.”
This politically bankrupt and reactionary declaration is only a foretaste of the campaign that will be waged by the Democratic Party and its satellite organizations, above all the unions, over the next five months. Defeating Trump will become the all-purpose rationale for casting a vote for the reactionary war criminal whom the Democratic Party establishment has anointed as its consensus candidate.
An opinion poll published last week, showing Clinton’s lead over Sanders in California dwindling to only two points, within the margin of error, has had the effect of electro-convulsive shock on the Democratic establishment.
Brown dropped his official pre-primary neutrality, while the Clinton campaign itself has scrapped plans for several candidate appearances in New Jersey, which also votes June 7, in favor of a hastily scheduled series of Hillary Clinton events in California beginning Thursday. New polls were commissioned, showing Clinton back in the lead by anywhere from eight points to 13 points.
Media pundits with the closest ties to the Clinton campaign, like eminently corruptible Paul Krugman of the New York Times, have weighed with another round of commentaries declaring the Democratic contest over and Clinton the unchallengeable winner, regardless of the potential loss of the most populous US state to Sanders.
Under the headline “Feel the Math,” Krugman gave his umpteenth assurance that delegate numbers were all that mattered, and from that standpoint, Clinton’s victory was assured. He dismissed what he called “hyperventilating” over the poll showing a tight race in California, asking, “[H]as her lead ‘evaporated,’ as some reports suggest? Probably not: Another poll, taken at the very same time, showed an 18-point lead.”
Krugman has utilized his column in the Times to serve as a political hack for Clinton. After receiving the cold shoulder during the first years of the Obama presidency, he has since been brought on board and now functions as a chief propagandist for the White House. He no doubt senses—or has received assurances—that he will have a position for himself in any future Clinton administration.
Other political chits are being called in. The National Resources Defense Council, a major environmental group which has never before endorsed a presidential candidate, publicly backed Hillary Clinton Tuesday in a statement issued by its political action fund. While the statement cited an energy speech by Donald Trump in North Dakota as the reason of its endorsement, its significance for the June 7 primary in California is obvious.
Sanders continues to hold huge rallies across the state, attended by thousands, many of them young people, while Clinton events have been much smaller, generally attended only by Democratic Party office holders and their staffs, union officials and representatives of other pro-Democratic Party organizations.
As the title of Brown’s open letter indicates, independent voters—those registered as having no party—will play a major role in the outcome of the Democratic presidential contest in California. Clinton has won all but one closed primary, those limited to registered Democrats only.
Independents can vote in the Democratic primary when they go to the polls, simply by requesting a presidential ballot. However, if they vote by mail, as half of Californians are expected to do, they had to contact local election offices by Tuesday to request a ballot for the Democratic presidential primary. A pro-Sanders group filed a federal lawsuit last week to extend that deadline, but the court has not yet issued a response.
LA RAZA HILLARIA KNOWS WHO HER PAYMASTERS ARE!
The Telmex Foundation, founded by Mexican
billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between
$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary
Clinton.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more
aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not
only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse
to act, as president I would do everything possible under the
law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning …"
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of – The rise of the Mex welfare state in America
billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between
$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary
Clinton.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more
aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not
only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse
to act, as president I would do everything possible under the
law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning …"
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of – The rise of the Mex welfare state in America
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/07/james-walsh-hispanicazation-of-america.html
in just three years, mostly as a result of illegal immigration. Mexicans
encouraged to breed at all costs. "A baby a year" Mexican pride slogan
emerges …EVERY ANCHOR BABY GETS MORE WELFARE FOR
18 YEARS. THAT CHILD IS ALSO STILL A CITIZEN OF
MEXICO!
The birthrate among illegals is more than double that of legal US residents. The Pew Hispanic Center calculates that within seven years, the children of immigrants, legal and illegal, will account for one in nine school-age children in the US.
2003: Mexican population in U.S. reported to have increased 10 percent
in just three years, mostly as a result of illegal immigration. Mexicans
encouraged to breed at all costs. "A baby a year" Mexican pride slogan
emerges …EVERY ANCHOR BABY GETS MORE WELFARE FOR
18 YEARS. THAT CHILD IS ALSO STILL A CITIZEN OF
MEXICO!
“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY
We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within
our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan”
or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New
Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico.
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/study_shows_immigrants_use_40_more_welfare_than_native_born.html#ixzz48GVoFIAJ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
MEXICAN PRESIDENT ENDORSES LA RAZA
://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/09/why-mexico-endorses-hillary-clinton-her.html
Expect even more executive power grabs from Hillary | WashingtonExaminer.com
APPARENTLY MEXICO'S LOOTING IN OUR OPEN
BORDERS IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR LA RAZA HILLARY!
Obama expanded his power domestically far more than any other president in memory. His executive action on immigration is a good example of legislating from the bureaucracy by implementing policies directly contrary to existing law and anything Congress would be willing to do. The server scandal is a metaphor for the old Hillary — opaque, controlling, paranoid, ruthless and power-hungry. It's proof that she hasn't changed.
SHE PROMISES OPEN BORDERS, CHAIN MIGRATION, NO E-VERIFY, EXPANDED LA RAZA CARE on the gringo's backs!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/05/former-president-fox-of-narcomex.html
our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan”
or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New
Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico.
THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN
AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA
RAZA “THE RACE”.
AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA
RAZA “THE RACE”.
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Tuesday, September 4, 2007 In his first state of the union speech since becoming president of Mexico, Felipe Calderon criticized the U.S. government and its efforts to shut down illegal immigration. During the speech Calderon proclaimed that “Mexico does not end at its borders” and that “where there is a Mexican, there is a Mexico.” Tune in for a full report on Calderon’s vigorous fight to protect Mexican interests in the United States—even when they’re built on illegal immigration.
"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens --- was the last gasp of white America in California." --- Art Torres,
Chairman of the California Democratic Party… NOW THE PARTY for LA
RAZA SUPREMACY… do a search for Barack Obama and LA RAZA.
Chairman of the California Democratic Party… NOW THE PARTY for LA
RAZA SUPREMACY… do a search for Barack Obama and LA RAZA.
MEXIFORNIA… where LA RAZA loots first and votes DEM secondly.
“Until the dishonesty and tactical bluster cease,
California is at serious risk of becoming a Third
World entity, and the longer Democrats are in
power, the more businesses will continue to flee
the state, the more wealthy taxpayers will relocate
and the more our standard of living will continue
to decline.”
California is at serious risk of becoming a Third
World entity, and the longer Democrats are in
power, the more businesses will continue to flee
the state, the more wealthy taxpayers will relocate
and the more our standard of living will continue
to decline.”
…..here’s what LA RAZA does when they invade, occupy and loot:
LOS ANGELES: Mexico’s second largest city,
gateway for the Mexican drug cartels and LA
RAZA capital for anchor baby welfare to ONE
BILLION DOLLARS a year!
gateway for the Mexican drug cartels and LA
RAZA capital for anchor baby welfare to ONE
BILLION DOLLARS a year!
Will Mexico bankrupt California before it surrenders its borders?
Mexico declares Los Angeles officially under LA RAZA SUPREMACY occupation.
May 10, 2016
Study shows immigrants use 40% more welfare than native born
By Rick Moran
A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies shows that immigrants tap into our welfare system far more than native born Americans.
Daily Caller:
Daily Caller:
The average immigrant household draws more
than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year,
costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than
people born in the country, a new study finds.
Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.
If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.
Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.
The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.
“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.
More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies shows that immigrants tap into our welfare system far more than native born Americans.
Daily Caller:
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
Daily Caller:
The average immigrant household draws more than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year, costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than people born in the country, a new study finds.If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.
Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.
Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.
The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.
“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.
More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/study_shows_immigrants_use_40_more_welfare_than_native_born.html#ixzz48GVoFIAJ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
MEXICAN PRESIDENT ENDORSES LA RAZA
SUPREMACIST HILLARIA CLINTON.
The staggering cost of Mexico’s looting of
America
America
The Telmex Foundation, founded by Mexican
billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between
$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary
Clinton.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more
aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not
only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive
immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse
to act, as president I would do everything possible under the
law to go even further." She added, "That is just the
beginning …"
billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between
$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary
Clinton.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more
aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not
only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive
immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse
to act, as president I would do everything possible under the
law to go even further." She added, "That is just the
beginning …"
APPARENTLY MEXICO'S LOOTING IN OUR OPEN
BORDERS IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR LA RAZA HILLARY!
Obama expanded his power domestically far more than any other president in memory. His executive action on immigration is a good example of legislating from the bureaucracy by implementing policies directly contrary to existing law and anything Congress would be willing to do.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning …"
://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2006/10/importing-poverty-immigration-and-poverty-in-the-united-states-a-book-of-charts
ROBERT RECTOR: Importing poverty…. WE
ALSO IMPORT ALL THEIR CRIMINALS
SHE PROMISES OPEN BORDERS, CHAIN MIGRATION, NO E-VERIFY, EXPANDED LA RAZA CARE on the gringo's backs!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/05/former-president-fox-of-narcomex.html
REALITY OF JOE LEGAL vs LA RAZA JOSE
ILLEGAL:
ILLEGAL:
“While the declining job market in the United States may be
discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of illegal
aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as
drug-smuggling “mules.”
discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of illegal
aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as
drug-smuggling “mules.”
No comments:
Post a Comment