From December 2012 to March 2016, 94 Fast and Furious weapons were seized; Fast and Furious weapon found in “Chapo” Guzman hideout (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today released Justice Department documents showing that weapons sent from the U.S. into Mexico as part of the Obama administration’s Operation Fast and Furious gunrunning program have...
"The country is now at the edge of an abyss following years of obfuscation, unaccountability, subterfuge, and law evasion by the Obama administration that have numbed much of its citizenry into a kind of base “group think acceptance” of government corruption and abuse of power. Resetting Americans’ trust in government needs to start with holding people in high office, like Hillary Clinton, accountable."
May 26, 2016
Would Obama Trump The Donald by pardoning illegals?
With every passing day, Donald Trump's chances of winning the presidency increase.
Hillary Clinton's campaign is floundering. She has no message aside from "Elect me; I'm a woman." She is hated by 30 to 40% of Democratic voters who prefer Bernie Sanders – or, for that matter, anybody but her. Her e-mail problems are growing worse – from the inspector general's recent report to the ongoing FBI investigation. And Trump has indicated that he is willing to use every single bit of dirt from her 30-year-long trail of sleaze against her in the general campaign.
Hillary Clinton's campaign is floundering. She has no message aside from "Elect me; I'm a woman." She is hated by 30 to 40% of Democratic voters who prefer Bernie Sanders – or, for that matter, anybody but her. Her e-mail problems are growing worse – from the inspector general's recent report to the ongoing FBI investigation. And Trump has indicated that he is willing to use every single bit of dirt from her 30-year-long trail of sleaze against her in the general campaign.
One of Trump's primary issues, and an issue that is the cause of much his popularity, is his promise to end illegal immigration and deport some 12 to 20 million illegals already in the U.S. It's an issue that resonates broadly with the white working class, whose standard of living has been steadily eroded by offshoring jobs to China and Mexico.
The Obama administration's policy of letting illegals from a third-world country stay in the U.S. to compete with native-born Americans for jobs and government benefits adds insult to injury.
As Trump's chances of winning increase, it's time to start asking a pretty important question: what will a lame-duck Obama do between November and January if Trump does actually win?
My guess is that Obama will pardon a substantial number (if not all) of the illegals to sabotage Trump's deportation plan.
Here's why I think it could happen. First, "Improper Entry by Alien" is a pardonable offense against the United States. Eight U.S. Code Sec. 1325 defines it as a crime with prison sentences ranging from 6 months to 2 years; thus, the president does have the power under Article II of the Constitution to grant pardons for it.
Second, Obama has consistently sided with foreigners against American interests. Refusal to deport large numbers of illegals is one example, but there are numerous others.
Obama told Russian president Medvedev that he would be "more flexible after his last election." His national security adviser recently admitted that the press and the public were intentionally hoodwinked on the Iran nuclear deal. Obama bowed to Saudi princes and apologized to Iran for the 1953 Mossadegh coup. He bypassed Congress and allied with the British and French to attack Libya. He announced in Berlin in 2008 that he is a "citizen of the world."
Obama went to Nelson Mandela's funeral – but spurned Justice Scalia's. He claimed to be born in Kenya to his own publisher, instigating the "birther controversy" he later snidely mocked.
Obama identifies with third-worlders, not Americans. It would fit a pattern for him to choose the side of Mexican illegals over American citizens and over U.S. immigration law.
Third, there is precedent for a mass pardon. In 1977, Jimmy Carter pardoned hundreds of thousands of individuals who evaded the draft during the Vietnam War.
Could Obama trump Trump by issuing a blanket lame-duck pardon? He could, and I think he would. The Democratic Party has abandoned the white native-born American working class. Its core constituencies are liberal whites with a globalist outlook and minority racial groups who vote on the basis of identity politics. Pardoning illegals after a Trump victory would strengthen the 21st-century Democratic Party base and cement Obama's legacy on the globalist, anti-American, anti-white, pro-minority left. It's a win-win for him.
The possibility that Obama's last official act will be to "fundamentally transform" America by making 12 to 20 million third-worlders permanent residents of the U.S. is something to think about more and more as November approaches and the Trump juggernaut rolls on.
My guess is that Obama will pardon a substantial number (if not all) of the illegals to sabotage Trump's deportation plan.
Here's why I think it could happen. First, "Improper Entry by Alien" is a pardonable offense against the United States. Eight U.S. Code Sec. 1325 defines it as a crime with prison sentences ranging from 6 months to 2 years; thus, the president does have the power under Article II of the Constitution to grant pardons for it.
Second, Obama has consistently sided with foreigners against American interests. Refusal to deport large numbers of illegals is one example, but there are numerous others.
Obama told Russian president Medvedev that he would be "more flexible after his last election." His national security adviser recently admitted that the press and the public were intentionally hoodwinked on the Iran nuclear deal. Obama bowed to Saudi princes and apologized to Iran for the 1953 Mossadegh coup. He bypassed Congress and allied with the British and French to attack Libya. He announced in Berlin in 2008 that he is a "citizen of the world."
Obama went to Nelson Mandela's funeral – but spurned Justice Scalia's. He claimed to be born in Kenya to his own publisher, instigating the "birther controversy" he later snidely mocked.
Obama identifies with third-worlders, not Americans. It would fit a pattern for him to choose the side of Mexican illegals over American citizens and over U.S. immigration law.
Third, there is precedent for a mass pardon. In 1977, Jimmy Carter pardoned hundreds of thousands of individuals who evaded the draft during the Vietnam War.
Could Obama trump Trump by issuing a blanket lame-duck pardon? He could, and I think he would. The Democratic Party has abandoned the white native-born American working class. Its core constituencies are liberal whites with a globalist outlook and minority racial groups who vote on the basis of identity politics. Pardoning illegals after a Trump victory would strengthen the 21st-century Democratic Party base and cement Obama's legacy on the globalist, anti-American, anti-white, pro-minority left. It's a win-win for him.
The possibility that Obama's last official act will be to "fundamentally transform" America by making 12 to 20 million third-worlders permanent residents of the U.S. is something to think about more and more as November approaches and the Trump juggernaut rolls on.
With every passing day, Donald Trump's chances of winning the presidency increase.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/would_obama_trump_the_donald_by_pardoning_illegals.html#ixzz49mATtxfB
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/study_shows_immigrants_use_40_more_welfare_than_native_born.html#ixzz48GVoFIAJ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
MEXICAN PRESIDENT ENDORSES LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILLARIA CLINTON.
://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/09/why-mexico-endorses-hillary-clinton-her.html
Expect even more executive power grabs from Hillary | WashingtonExaminer.com
APPARENTLY MEXICO'S LOOTING IN OUR OPEN
BORDERS IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR LA RAZA HILLARY!
Obama expanded his power domestically far more than any other president in memory. His executive action on immigration is a good example of legislating from the bureaucracy by implementing policies directly contrary to existing law and anything Congress would be willing to do. The server scandal is a metaphor for the old Hillary — opaque, controlling, paranoid, ruthless and power-hungry. It's proof that she hasn't changed.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/05/former-president-fox-of-narcomex.html
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/would_obama_trump_the_donald_by_pardoning_illegals.html#ixzz49mATtxfB
May 10, 2016
Study shows immigrants use 40% more welfare than native born
A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies shows that immigrants tap into our welfare system far more than native born Americans.
Daily Caller:
Daily Caller:
The average immigrant household draws more than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year, costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than people born in the country, a new study finds.
If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.
Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.
Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.
The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.
“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.
More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies shows that immigrants tap into our welfare system far more than native born Americans.
Daily Caller:
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
Daily Caller:
The average immigrant household draws more than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year, costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than people born in the country, a new study finds.If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.
Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.
Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.
The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.
“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.
More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.
Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/study_shows_immigrants_use_40_more_welfare_than_native_born.html#ixzz48GVoFIAJ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
MEXICAN PRESIDENT ENDORSES LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILLARIA CLINTON.
The staggering cost of Mexico’s looting of
America
America
The Telmex Foundation, founded by Mexican
billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between
$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary
Clinton.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more
aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not
only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive
immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse
to act, as president I would do everything possible under the
law to go even further." She added, "That is just the
beginning …"
billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between
$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary
Clinton.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more
aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not
only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive
immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse
to act, as president I would do everything possible under the
law to go even further." She added, "That is just the
beginning …"
APPARENTLY MEXICO'S LOOTING IN OUR OPEN
BORDERS IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR LA RAZA HILLARY!
Obama expanded his power domestically far more than any other president in memory. His executive action on immigration is a good example of legislating from the bureaucracy by implementing policies directly contrary to existing law and anything Congress would be willing to do.
Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning …"
://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2006/10/importing-poverty-immigration-and-poverty-in-the-united-states-a-book-of-charts
SHE PROMISES OPEN BORDERS, CHAIN MIGRATION, NO E-VERIFY, EXPANDED LA RAZA CARE on the gringo's backs!
ROBERT RECTOR: Importing poverty…. WE
ALSO IMPORT ALL THEIR CRIMINALS
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/05/former-president-fox-of-narcomex.html
No comments:
Post a Comment